Sunday, 16 November 2025

Psalm 23:5 and The Eucharist - An Insight.

Psalm 23:5 and The Eucharist - An Insight. 

The Book of Psalms 23:5 reads, "You prepare a table before me in the presence of my enemies. You anoint my head with oil; my cup overflows".

My cup over flows -

What is the significance of over flowing someone's cup? Why should someone do that? Is there any message in doing so? Let us unlock the understanding by looking into few historical cultural contexts.

In Persian royal culture, as the dinner drew to a close, a few special guests were summoned by a eunuch to approach the king and to drink in his company. This was a mark of exceptional distinction because it was during these drinking bouts that important matters of state were discussed - and personal ambitions might be realised. The courtier honoured with a regular place at the king's table was known as a "homotrapezus" (‘messmate’) a very rare and enviable title held by trusted nobles of the highest rank. The word "homotrapezus" is a Latin transliteration of a Greek word, likely combining the Greek prefix homo (meaning "same" or "equal") with a form of the Greek word trapeza (meaning "table" or "bank").

My comments on "Overflowing the Cup" - Dining with the King has a purpose and only a very few courtiers or delegates will attend and share the table with the King.

If the King says to the Wine dispenser to stop pouring wine into a person's cup, it means that the King has nothing to discuss with him apart from this and he may leave the table; if someone's cup is filled to the brim, this means that there is something more to discuss with him; and if someone's cup is overflowed, this means that the King likes your association and wants you to share his table till the end.

This is the significance of sharing the table with the King.

What has this to do with Psalms 23:5? The answer lies in the Eucharist, which we take part in the remembrance of the Wounded Body and the Sacrificial Blood of Jesus on the Cross of Calvary for our sins (1 Corinthians 11:24-26).

When we part take in the Eucharist, it is like God our Eternal King, sharing His Cup filled to the brim or overflowing our cup has a significance. Every time we receive the Eucharist, it is our Lord saying to us or wanting from us to have a continuous relationship with Him. He is more interested and wants us to be in fellowship with Him, and never want us to leave the table. He wants us to enjoy the association with Him. The Lord wants us to understand one more important thing - sharing the table with us has an important indication, you are sanctified and consecrated to part take in the Lord's Table, or in other words you are too important to be ignored by the Lord Himself. See what a beautiful thing this is.

Now the question is, whom do you want to associate with - in a God who left you to your fate, or in a God who wants to save you and always keeps you by His side? The choice is up to you. 

God bless.

Friday, 7 November 2025

Esther - A Queen In The Making.

The Coronation of Queen Esther, from the 1617 Scroll of Esther from Ferrara, Italy.

The story starts with a Benjaminite, a Jew, by name Mordecai was taken one among many captives by king Nebuchadnezzar-II (605-562 BC) of Babylon after the destruction of Jerusalem in the year 587/6 BC (Es.2:5,6).  It is just a hypothesis that, along with Mordecai, Esther's parents might have also moved or else they might have been born and married in the exile itself, and Esther was born in the exile too. The events of the Book of Esther might have happened between 486 - 465 BC. From the distruction of Jerusalem to the king Xerxes-I of the Book of Esther is atleast 108 years. By this time Mordecai is been an old man and Esther in her adolescent age. Mordecai might have been an abled and skilled person who impressed Nebuchadnezzar-II and was taken captive (2Ki.24:14), and was been in the service of the king's court since then, till the time of Xerxes-I (Es.2:5).

Before giving the big banquet by king Ahasuerus (Xshayarasha - Persian name) (probably king Xerxes-I) to the Satraps of 127 provinces, the king has returned from War on Greece in 479 BC unsatisfactory to the city of Susa. The War on Greece started in the year 480 BC. In his inscriptions in the city of Persepolis we find the king's territorial expansion. "Xerxes the king proclaims: By the favour of Ahuramazda, these are the countries of which I was King outside Persia; I ruled them; they bore me tribute. What was said to them by me, that they did. The law that was mine, that held them firm: Media, Elam, Arachosia, Armenia, Drangiana, Parthia, Areia, Bactria, Sogdiana, Chorasmia, Babylonia, Assyria, Sattagydia, Lydia, Egypt, Ionians who dwell by the Sea and those who dwell beyond the Sea, the Maka people, Arabia, Gandara, Indus, Cappadocia, Dahae, Scythians, (Saka) who drink haoma, Scythians (Saka) who wear pointed hats, Thrace, the Akaufaka people, Libyans, Carians, Nubians" (XPh). It is undeniable that the territory that king Xerxes-I reigned was very vast. In his grand, lavish banquet, the king wanted his queen to show-off her beauty in the midst of the Satraps, which she ignored. The reason is that, the costumes of those times were accentuated (make more noticeable and prominent). The textile was tailored to emphasize and noticeable a particular feature of the body. Vasthi in ancient Indo-Iranian means "Vashishta, meaning 'the best'". She kept her spirit and because she refused to listen to the king, she was not allowed to enter in the king's presence, and her royal position is to be given to another suitable and more worthy woman (Es.1:15-19). This is how God planned to bring in Esther into the royal court.

The harem has a special importance in Persian royal house. Queen, other wives, concubines, their children lived in the harem. The harem is the most secured place with high fortification walls and well guarded with soldiers. Usually the harem is attached to the king's quarters. Xerxes-I palace was connected to the royal harem by two grand, well-worked flights of stairs, which must have been utilised  by the king when he required direct access to the rooms below. The queen plays an important role in the harem. Under her jurisdiction lies the concubines and others. The king is under huge pressure to beget sons. The place of the queen is unstable if the king finds a favoured woman. She if be a concubine by giving birth to a son can gain some hierarchy in her position. Sexual relations between the king and the chosen women of the harem were embedded in complex politics of dynastic reproduction. The queen, the future king's mother held highest place of authority among all the women of the harem. Plutarch wrote, "no one shared the table of Persian king, except his mother or his consort, the queen seated below him, the mother above him". The mothers, consorts, and other women in the orbit of the great king had real influence. 


Now that the queen Vashti's place is empty, 
"Let a search be made for beautiful young virgins for the king. ...bring all these beautiful young women into the harem at the citadel of Susa", (Es.2:2,3). It is a royal practice whereby scouts and spies were sent across the empire to bring back to court pretty girls who might be trained in the arts of music, poetry, and beauty to become royal concubines. Concubinage was a difficult existence. Many concubines were trained by eunuch overseers and senior women to be skilled musicians, cultured dancers, and brilliant storytellers. Concubines were not prostitutes. Concubines tended to oscillate between pleasure-women and women of state. Darius-I (522 - 486 BC), the father of Xerxes-I (the king of the Book of Esther), at the end of his period selected his fiftieth girl from the harem as his latest love interest. Concubinage could lead to a stable relationship with the king. An established concubine would find prestige and honour within the harem when children she had brone the king were officially acknowledged as his heirs. Concubines were supposed to be physically appealing since the arousal of desire in the ruler was essential. Antigonism between concubines and between wives and concubines was common. Women who had sexual relationship with the king would have had greater status than those who had no access to his bed. The life of these women were not for themselves, but for creating other lives. They were required to keep intact the dynasty, and secure future generations to come. King Artaxerxes-I had atleast 18 sons with concubines, and Artaxerxes-II had no fewer than 150 sons. The birth of a son would terminate the concubine's sexual relationship with the ruler. If the concubine gave the king a series of daughter's, then their sexual relationship could continue, but once the couple were blessed with a son sexual relationship ceased and the ruler moved on to a new concubine. Darius-II, son of Artaxerxes-I was the son of a Babylonian concubine. 
Such was the competition into which God had let His elect Esther for the emancipation of His people. How did God established Esther in a world of carnal and sensual competitors? How did Esther find favour in the eyes of Xerxes-I? Was it sensual or did God had a special plan to find favour for her in the eyes of the king? 

Here comes out protagonist Esther. As read above she was young adolescent girl who was much sought after for the king by his scouts and spies (Rs.2:2,3). Her father is Abihail (Es.2:15). The Jewish Midrash adds that Esther’s father died during her mother’s pregnancy, and her mother died during childbirth (Esther Rabbah 6:5; BT Megillah 13a). As a result of her mother’s death, Mordecai had adopted Esther. Esther's hebrew name is Hadassah, the name of "myrtle tree" (hadas). Her gentile name is Esther derived from the name of famous goddess Ishtar. The name Esther is a Persian origin, which means "star" (stara). Esther was so called because she was righteous, and the righteous are called “myrtles”; she was of average height, like a myrtle, which is neither short nor long; she had a greenish (sallow) complexion, like a myrtle (BT Megillah). Just as the myrtle is sweet-smelling but has a bitter taste, so Esther was sweet to Ahasuerus, but bitter to Haman (Esther Rabbah6:5). The myrtle has a good smell, and the myrtle does not dry out either in summer or in winter. In Achaemenid Persian culture and Zoroastrian belief, trees, especially evergreens and Plane trees, were religious symbols, often representing the "Tree of Life". Assyrian kings were frequently represented with as the "tree of life".
Another protagonist of the Book of Esther, Xerxes-I, is a great lover of nature. A cylinder seal (picture above) has Xerxes, (whose name is boldly inscribed), is shown in the act of adorning a tree with votive offerings of jewellery. He worships at the tree because it is a holy conduit where he can encounter god. A story is told in the Histories, by Herodotus, that, when Xerxes-I on his march to the war on Greece in 480 BC, on his way in the town of Kallatebos, by a roadside saw a magnificent "Plane tree". He was was smitten with love for it. He moaned over it, praised it, adored it, and loaded it with lavish gifts, like those bestowed on a lover. Xerxes-I hung the tree's branches with golden ornaments, until it's branches groaned with its weight. He arranged a man there to look after the tree, and continued on his way back to the war. Though it seems to be a bizarre story, though some ridiculed it as like Aelian, it shows how king Xerxes-I loved the nature and especially, the sweet smelling lush green trees. This very love for nature and trees of the king and the means of connecting god through these trees, is what God of the Bible used to emancipate His people. God used Hadassah for this purpose. 
Just imagine, after going through an year long intense training under the eunuchs of the harem (Es.2:12), now Esther entered the bed chamber of the king with all her expertise in cosmetics and perfumes. Standing before the king; upon seeing this beautifully dressed youthful woman, the king asks for her name. Esther replied, "I'm Hadassah". Just imagine upon listening to the name Hadassah, the king's thoughts might have filled with all the lush green, sweet smelling, godly conduit, postive nature. Even before having an another word with her, he fell in love with her. The Book of Esther 2:17, reads, "The king loved Esther more than all the other women. She won more favour and approval from him than did any of the other virgins. He placed the royal crown on her head and made her Queen in place of Vashti". This how God made Esther a queen and worked out a plan to bring back His people to the land of Jews and reconstructed His Temple in Jerusalem.

So, let's not hurry God, let us wait upon Him with faith and obedience. For He has planned good things in our life. He will fullfill everything He has promised for us. Joshua 21:45 reads, "Not one of all the LORD's good promises to Israel failed; every one was fulfilled".

- A few lines for this article are taken from "Persians, The Age of The Great King's", by Lloyd Llewellyn-Jones.

Tuesday, 30 September 2025

Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego - Old Bible story in the new light.

Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego - Old Bible story in the new light.

Most of us all are aware of this story in the Book of Daniel, 3rd Chapter. Now you may think what is new to say in this, because the story is in an active voice and in itself is like a calligram while going through it, and that's the end of it.

Is our visualisation true? Does king Nebuchadnezzar-II wanted to burn alive the three young men? Is this all what he wanted or did he wanted to torture them more? Let's find out.

Burning alive his captives or enemies is under the jurisdiction of a king. Assyrian Kings like Assurdan-II (934-912 BC), Ashurnarsipal-II (883-859 BC), and Shalmanesser-III (858-824 BC), all followed the same procedure of burning alive their captives. We don't know whether they did this act as a spectacle in an open air or not. This continued down to the Babylonian empire and to the Persians as well. To show his superiority over his subjects, and to discipline his subjects, kings generally used to torture their victims by gruesome techniques, by impaling, flaying of skin while alive etc.  

The story of Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego according to the Book of Daniel happened in the reign of king Nebuchadnezzar-II (605-562 BC). But nowhere in the history in the acts of Nebuchadnezzar-II this kind of act is recorded. Violating a king's commandment is seen as an act of indiscipline. Punishments imposed are so cruel and torturous. From the Book of Daniel, 3rd Chapter, Verse 15, we read that, "you will be thrown immediately into the blazing furnace." The king made the furnace heated seven times than the normal. The flames scorched away the soldiers who tried to throw away the three young men. Generally the kings who ruled this part of the empire wanted to take their victim's life very slowly, which would be like a lesson for others who disobey the king. But this act of throwing them into the furnace that too seven times hotter than general will kill them in minutes. Did Nebuchadnezzar-II wanted to take their life so simply for an act of disobedience or did he wanted to take the victims life very slowly by making them realize what consequence they need to face for going against his commandments. Generally they opt for second option. How would the punishment of throwing the victim into a burning furnace take life slowly?

For this we need to travel further into the time of Persians. Darius-II (423-404 BC) inflecting the punishment on his brother, Sogdianus (424-423 BC), who tried to snatch away the throne from him. The punishment for treason is to "suffocate till death". A brick wall is built enclosed on all sides. The kiln is filled with wood and the victim is tied and lowered into it and sealed. The wood will burn until the oxygen is consumed within the kiln and the fire is extinguished. From the ashes comes smoke which will suffocate the victim filling his lungs with carbon-dioxide and slowly killing him. History says that, Sogdianus was lowered into a pile of ashes and was suffocated till death.

My intuition is that, Nebuchadnezzar-II also wanted to take life of the three young victims slowly and steadily, of course expecting cries of pardon for their disobedience to his commandment. But what happened is unexpected. Even before the furnace was sealed, Nebuchadnezzar-II saw four men walking around (4:25). And when they were brought out of the kiln, they even didn't smell the smoke (4:27). The smell of the smoke is written in the Amplified Bible, NLT, CEV, and Good News Translation. This word "smoke"*, made my intuitions strong about the slow and steady killing of the victim.

Whatever maybe the process of inflicting the punishment; in the midst of the trouble - God turns suffocation through carbon-dioxide into resuscitation of life with oxygen, sadness into joy, shame into glory, a place of pain and torture into a playful area, moreover, our very God's presence with us in times of trouble.
God bless.

*PS: Martyrdom of Polycarp, disciple of Apostle John :
From the eyewitness account -
....when he prayed, something miraculous happened. The fire swirled around him, but didn't burn. Also, witnesses say it didn't smell like smoke; instead, it smelled like bread baking or incense. The people around him were amazed that he did not burn, but when the emperor saw that he was still alive, he demanded that a sword be plunged into Polycarp....

Picture above is so close to my imagination - taken from -
https://www.biblecartoons.co.uk/blog/daniel-03-the-fiery-furnace

Wednesday, 20 August 2025

Adhering Your Word.

Adhering Your Word -

Changed History!
An Altered New History!
It is quite difficult for us to adapt to new history lessons. Isn't it? Then,
What if the alteration happend to our Sacred texts? Utter Chaos!

King Darius-I, who believes in Ahuramazda, had to rewrite the religious and civic law of Egypt. Egyptians has to accept it without any question. Both faiths are different. However, Darius-I with the assistance of the Egyptian priests writes down the law for them and he proudly propagandise it. Before Darius-I, his predecessor Cambyses-II has stopped/abolished the office of god's (Amun, primary god in Egypt) wife, a native sentiment in Upper Egypt. And even before Cambyses-II, Egyptian Pharaoh Amenhotep-IV or Akhenaten (changed name) has completely changed the order of worship. He destroyed the old sacred texts, tomb chapels, and images of god's etc.,
These events say that the Egyptian sacred texts were either destroyed or altered or spurious long back(?).

This is the same king Darius-I who also ruled Israel. Before loosing their kingdoms (Israel and Judah) to Assyria and Babylonia, the High Priest Hilkiah found the Book of God's Law and handed it over to King Josiah before their fall (2Kings 22 and 23rd Chapters). It was the same Law that was read over by Priest Ezra (Nehemiah 8:1-4; Ezra 6:18) after coming back from exile to the Promised Land.
In other words the Judahites must have carried the Law Book with them when the Jerusalem temple was destroyed by Nebuchadnezzar-II of Babylon.

"Teach me, Lord, the way of your decrees,
 that I may follow it to the end.
Give me understanding, so that I may keep your law
and obey it with all my heart.
Direct me in the path of your commands,
for there I find delight.
...
May your unfailing love come to me, Lord,
your salvation, according to your promise;
then I can answer anyone who taunts me,
for I trust in your word.
Never take your word of truth from my mouth,
for I have put my hope in your laws.
I will always obey your law,
for ever and ever.
I will walk about in freedom,
for I have sought out your precepts."
(Psalm 119:33-35; 41-45).

What if we didn't adhere to His commandments? What if God has not restored the Book of Law to us? What if, if we have lost it forever? What if, if someone had took initiative to give the Law as did king Darius-I to Egypt (a new law code)? Is it a moment of pride for the Lord to restore His Law by Darius a pagan devotee of Ahuramazda? Even if it was restored or rewritten with the help of High Priests, who would be magnified through that book of law - the Lord of the Holy Bible or Ahuramazda? Utter chaos. If Darius-I had rewritten the law, then he would have certainly propagandised it and we would know this today  through his inscriptions, but our God has kept them intact. To put this in another way, isn't our Lord out of His foresight knew of such and such a work from a pagan king and out of His providence rescued His lost Scriptures to His loved ones. No doubt, this is His providence.

Bless God that our Holy Scriptures aren't burnt down by King Nebuchadnezzar-II and are kept safe in the hands of the High Priest Hilkiah and Josiah, King of Judah. We need to praise God today for having the right Scriptures coming down to us from years long gone. We need to glorify our Lord because, we come face to face with Him through the uncorrupted Scriptures today.
"Hallelujah! Salvation and glory and power belong to our God, for true and just are His judgements" (Revelation 19:1, NIV).

Additional Notes:
• Pharaoh Amenhotep-IV or Akhenaten reigned Egypt approximately from 1353 to 1336 BC.
• King Josiah of Judah reigned approximately from 640 to 609 BC.
• King Nebuchadnezzar-II reigned approximately from 605 to 562 BC.
• Fall of Jerusalem in 587/586 BC.
• King Cambyses-II reigned approximately from 530 to 522 BC.
• King Darius-I reigned approximately from 522 to 486 BC.