Friday, 4 September 2026

Sennacherib - The King Who Boasted Against The Lord.

Sennacherib - The King Who Boasted Against The Lord.

                 Sennacherib on the Bas-relief of Lachish 

A barrel-shaped clay cylinder written sometime between 704 and 681BC records the many military campaigns of Sennacherib. Its opening captures in one fell swoop almost every desirable feature of a good king; Sennacherib calls himself a great, strong, and unrivaled king who is also a 'pious' and 'reverent' shepherd. He is a 'guardian of truth who loves justice, render assistance, and strives after good deeds', but he is also a 'virile warrior' who, like a 'bridle', controls those who refuse to obey and 'strikes enemies with lightning', writes Moudhy Al-Rashid in her book "Between two rivers".

What attracted me in his epithet are the words, "virile warrior who like a bridle controls those who refuse to obey and strikes the enemies with lightning". 

After his father Sargon-II's death in the campaign against Tabal in 705 BC against its ruler Gurdi or Kurti, Sennacherib took the throne in 704 BC (reign 704 - 681 BC) as king of Assyria. Sargon's death gave way to some vassal kings to break free from the yoke of Assyria. The majority of Sennacherib's military campaigns were directed against Babylonia. Marduk-aplu-iddina-II (703 - 702 BC) along with his Elamite ally rebelled against Assyria, but it was quelled and defeated. In the Bible this defeated king was written as Baladan (Merodach-Baladan or Berodach-Baladan) who sent messengers to see king Hezekiah as goodwill with gifts (2Kings 20:12) when he was recovering from illness. In his place Sennacherib put Bel-ibni on throne of Babylon, who was raised as a child in Assyria, and to put it in Sennacherib's words, 'he was grown up in my palace like a young dog'. Young dog? That's seems to be like boasting, too proud of himself. And there is much more to see of his boasting. With this initial success, Sennacherib steps into Levant. The Assyrian troops made their way to the western Levant in the summer of 701 BC. He regained Sidon, and replaced the king Luli with pro-Assyrian king Tu-Ba'lu. Several former vassals came forward to resume vassalship and paid their tributes. Among them were the leaders of cities from Samsimuruna, Sidon, Arwad, Byblos in Phoenicia, Ashdod in Philistia, Ashkelon, lands of Ammon, Moab, Edom East of Jordan river. However, several pockets of resistance remained.

In the city of Ekron, some 22 miles west of Jerusalem, anti-Assyrian rebels were determined not to back down. According to Sennacherib's account, the revolt in Ekron had started with local officials and other citizens despising their pro-Assyrian ruler, king Padi and handed him over to king Hezekiah of Judah (reigned 715 - 686 BC) bound in chains. King Padi was put in prison. When Ekron's New leaders realized that an Assyrian army was on it's way, they decided to carry on the fight. But they knew they needed outside help, which they found in Egypt. Since the time of king Ahaz of Judah (reigned around 735 - 715 BC), Judah was been a vassal of Assyria, when they took help of king Tiglath-Pileser-III (reigned 745 - 727 BC), when king Rezin of Aram (Syria) and king Pekah of Israel tried to invade Judah. 2Kings 16:7-10, describes all that has happened, however 2Chrinicles 28th chapter gives a different perspective of the whole episode. Even before this incident the northern kingdom Israel has already invaded by Tiglath-Pileser-III, followed by his two sons Shalmaneser-V (reigned 727 - 722 BC) and Sargon-II (reigned 722 - 705 BC) a complete capture. From then on Judah has been a vassal to Assyria. In king Hezekiah's period (reigned 715 -686 BC), Hezekiah revolt against the king of Assyria and refused to pay the tributes (2Kings 18:7). Probably this is the time when king Sargon-II died and some of the vassals wanted break free.

                       Ramp against the walls of Lachish.

In the fourteenth year of king Hezekiah's rule, which is 701 BC (2Kings 18:13), Sennacherib was concentrating to regain the Levant region. Knowing that Sennacherib is at Lachish, Hezekiah sent a message, probably asking for a pardon, for prisoning king Padi of Ekron, or rebelling against the king of Assyria. And as a token of thankfulness for withdrawing the troops, he sent gold and silver from the Temple and from his palace treasury (2Kings 18:14-16). Lachish was an important garrison city about 30 miles west of Jerusalem. This says that Sennacherib was attacking fortified towns of Judah is true (2Kings 18:13). In 2Kings 19:8, we read that Sennacherib leaving Lachish and was going to attack Libnah, which is another important town which was about 8 miles north-east of Lachish. On both the occasions Sennacherib sents a message and a letter through one of his officials 'Rabshakeh'. Sennacherib sent Rabshakeh, Tartan and Rabsaris to warn Judahites (2Kings 18:17). Rabashakeh is the chief-cupbearer to the king, Tartan is a commander-in-chief and Rabsaris is the chief of eunuchs or a chief court official.

King Hezekiah plead the Lord, "It is true that the kings of Assyria have destroyed all these nations. And they have thrown the gods of these nations into the fire and burned them". Why was king Hezekiah so emotional? It is due to the arrogant speech of the Rabshakeh. This arrogance is not of his own, but this comes out of the confidence in their king Sennacherib and in their or his god Ashur. Here is an example of Sennacherib's boasting. There is a 90 feet bas-relief (the original might be 726 feet) on display at British Museum in London, which display the theme of Sennacherib's siege and conquest of Lachish. Sennacherib through his message and a letter to the people of Jerusalem and king Hezekiah, he boasted that, not to put their confidence in the Pharaoh of Egypt or in their Lord, because none can help them in this situation. He boasted that the gods of all these nations couldn't help them from their defeat. It is your own God who permitted us to invade Judah. This is true in a way, 2Kings 19:25; Isaiah 37:26; 10:5, all read that, "the Lord has decided this decisive battle long ago, and now He is making it to happen". This battle is just the resultant of what the kings of Israel and Judah had brought upon themselves a godless nation, by following idolatry. Verse 7 of Chapter 10 of the Book of Isaiah reads, that "the Assyrian king himself doesn't know that, he is a tool in the hands of God". Not knowing this fact, Sennacherib is boasting as if he is undefeatable. Burning those idols made of wood and stone is the jealousy of the Living Lord. He boasts of sending 2000 horses, if the Judahites can find charioteers in their army (2Kings 18:23). It is such a shame to anyone who is ready for a battle at their doorstep. Sennacherib calls on few cities, Hamath, Arpad, Sepharvaim, Hena, Ivvah, Gozan, Haran, Rezeph, as an example that the gods of these cities are of no use before the Assyrian gods. This is a ridiculous challenge that Sennacherib tests with. Sennacherib in his Annals, claims that he "confined Hezekiah inside Jerusalem, his royal City, like a bird in a cage" . Sennacherib's confidence is not just of his own, but in his predecessors too who have, arrested, exiled, killed the kings of the conquered areas including Samaria. Demoralizing the citizens of Judah, Sennacherib boasted, "when we put this city under siege, they will suffer of hunger and thirst that they will eat their own dung and drink their own urine" (2Kings 18:27). This is just to say to take a lesson, that how they besieged Samaria and how they staged a battle with Samaria for three long years (2Kings 17:5), before they gave up. Probably there could have been a great famine in Samaria as in the past (2Kings 6:24,28-29). All this insult, ridicule, demoralizing, challenging, is to invite either of the three Eiakim, or Shebna or Joah to make a deal or a bargain with their king Sennacherib, before they go through all this disaster.

Now that the king Sennacherib received a report that the ally of king Hezekiah, king Tirhakah of Cush was leading an army to fight him. He left Lachish and went to meet the Egyptians (actually Ethiopians) (2Kings 19:9; Isaiah 37:9). King Tirhakah was the last Pharaoh of the 25th Cushite dynasty of Egypt. They are also called as Black Pharaohs. In Egyptian history He is known as Taharqo, son of Piankhi (reigned 690 - 664 BC). Now there is a confusion. Sennacherib was in battle with Egypt in 701 BC, but the Pharaoh mentioned in the Bible seems to be of a later period? How could this puzzle be solved? To understand this, we need to dig into a little history.
By 740's BC, just as the Cushites were beginning to consolidate their rule over the entire Nile valley (25th Cushite dynasty 747 - 657 BC), the Assyrian empire was being rebuilt under Tiglath-Pileser-III (745 - 727 BC). Shabaqo became King of Cush and Egypt (reign 716 - 702 BC). His cautious diplomacy first came to test when one of Assyrians more rebellious vassals, the king of Ashdod, fled to Egypt seeking political asylum. Shabaqo sent him back. When Sennacherib began a systematic consolidation of his western territories, Shabaqo decided that the covert encouragement of local insurgencies would serve its interests better, and began to stir discontent among the fractious rulers of the Near Eastern city states. Sennacherib invaded Palestine to supress a revolt, whereupon one of the ringleaders, king Hezekiah of Judah, turned to Egypt for military support. Shabaqo could not refuse, he summoned his nephew Taharqo, who was still a prince, to lead the campaign. The two armies met at Eltekeh, 10 miles from Ashdod in 701 BC. Taharqo's army was besieged, then defeated by Assyrians. Withdrawing to a safe distance, he planned to attack the Assyrians from rear once they moved onto Jerusalem to demand Hezekiah's surrender. But Sennacherib recalled his troops from the Judean hills, faced the Egyptian attack, and forced Taharqo to flee back to Egypt. This is mentioned in Toby Wilkinson's, "The rise and fall of ancient Egypt" book. 
Herodotus in his work "Histories", in Book-2 (Euterpe), Chapter 141, has a different story to say. Histories was authored some 250 years after Sennacherib's death. But this is worth reading. King Sennacherib had pitched a camp at Pelusium in the eastern Nile delta. The armies of Sethos was ready to meet them in the battlefield. That night in the camp, the field mice in large numbers attacked the arms of Assyrians. The mice gnawed through the strings of Assyrian bows and the handles of Assyrian shields, so the next day the the Egyptian king Sethos (either Shabaqo or Shabitqo is doubtful) scored an easy victory over the unarmed Assyrians. Sennacherib Annals put it, "the king of lower Egypt and the archers, chariots, and horses of the king of Meluhha (Cush), forces without number, came to their aid. Sennacherib considers this as great victory. But some scholars argue that the battle was a stalemate.
The stalemate or negotiated settlement idea was proposed by a Canadian journalist, Henry Aubin in 2002.
There are a few more analysis on this battle and it's outcomes, but I don't want to get into those legends.

Sennacherib now returns back from Egypt to Jerusalem, where his personal cupbearer Rabshakeh is incharge of the sieged city. History is not clear about the days of sige, it might be for a few days or some say it continued for a few months. Whatever may be the time, it is true that the city was besieged. Sennacherib in his Annals, boasts that he "confined Hezekiah inside Jerusalem, like a bird in a cage". The situation is that the Assyrians are ready for the battle at the walls of Jerusalem. Then the Lord spoke to Prophet Isaiah to convey this message to king Hezekiah. The Lord said, "I have heard your prayer about king Sennacherib of Assyria". Though the Lord planned to punish his people for their disobedience against Him, and wanted to use Assyria as a "rod of His anger" (Isaiah 10:5), the Lord seems to have kept this plan aside for a little more time, because He is a God of compassion, mercy, and longsuffering (Psalm 86:15). Whatever may the pressure that exerted by Rabshakeh on the king of Judah, Hezekiah has learnt a lesson from the collection of Proverbs by Solomon, and to follow it at the right time is a character of a wise man. Book of Proverbs Chapter 25, verse 1, reads, "These are the proverbs of Solomon which the men of Hezekiah king of Judah copied". The lesson is this, "Don't answer the foolish arguments of fools, or you will become as foolish as they are" (Proverbs 26:4). That's the reason why Hezekiah command his men not to answer (2Kings 18:36). Hezekiah took his petitions to the Temple of the Lord (2Kings 19:14), and prayed. He depended on the Lord and wanted the Lord to answer those fools for their foolish arguments, and to prove that their decision to make a war on the Holy City is unwise (Proverbs 26:5). His petition is answered. The Lord accepted the challenge of Sennacherib and said, "Whom have you been defying and ridiculing? Against whom did you raise your voice? At whom did you look with such haughty eyes? It is the Hole One of Israel. I know you (Sennacherib) well - your coming and going. I know the way you have raged against me, your arrogance, which I heard for myself. Now I will put my hook in your nose and my bit in your mouth (bridle and bit which controls horses). I will make you return by the same road on which you came" (Isaiah 37:23, 28-29). 

.                        King Sennacherib on the throne.

The Bible reads, "That night the angel of the Lord went out to the Assyrian camp and killed 185000 Assyrian soldiers. When the surviving Assyrians woke up the next morning, they found corpses everywhere" (2Kings 19:35; Isaiah 37:36). My Dad bought me an imported book by Reader's Digest, "The last two million years" revised in 1974 copy, while going through the chapter, "Dawn of civilization in the land of two rivers", I read, "But the Assyrians failed to take Jerusalem before plague forced them to withdraw". As a kid, I never took it seriously, but when I read those lines now, it seems like all things fall in line. Greek historian Herodotus wrote that, the night before the war with Egypt, the field mice attacked the camp of Assyrians at Pelusium in large numbers. "Plague, the bacteria usually spreads through flea bites, it is contagious from other people and animals. Bubonic plague is a pestis infection that travels to your lymph nodes from a flea bites. It makes large, swollen lymph nodes called buboes. Bubonic plague is the most common form of plague. Fleas are highly aggressive, multiply quickly, and easily switch to human hosts when their rodent host dies", writes Cleveland Clinic, a multispecialty academic medical center with research and education, on its website on "Plague" in 01/05/2026 updated journal. It seems that even king Hezekiah was affected by this disease. "About that time Hezekiah became deathly ill" reads 2Kings 20:1. Is it the effect of plague that was came with Assyrians from Egypt? It might be, because after conveying the message of the Lord by prophet Isaiah, he said, "Bring a cake (polutice) of figs. And let the servants take and lay it on the boil, that he may recover" (2Kings 20:7). The word "boil", in Hebrew word boil means, inflamed spot, inflammation, eruption. And more importantly, Marduk-aplu-iddina (reigned 703 -702 BC) (in the Bible "Baladan", 2Kings 20:12) has sent his messengers to greet the king Hezekiah fall in the same timeline. And in addition, according to Herodotus "Histories", Pharaoh Sethos (Shabaqo), the king of Egypt who sent his nephew Taharqo to fight Assyrians, setting up an image of himself in the temple of "Hephaestus" (the Egyptian god Ptah) with a mouse in his hand". Why would an Egyptian pharaoh made such a statue? The travel time on a horse from Egypt to Jerusalem would take 4 to 6 days, and the incubation period of Bubonic plague is 2 to 8 days. By the time Sennacherib and his army reached the walls of Jerusalem, they were already carrying the virus or the pathogen of plague with them. And that night in the camp of Sennacherib, the angel of the Lord went out killing Assyrian soldiers. The Lord did this because the Rabshakeh of Sennacherib challenged God. Challenging God is like inviting an unsuccessful personal fight with Him. For the Lord said, "I will defend this city for My own honor...." (2Kings 20:6).

Did God just stopped by sending an angel unto the camp of Assyrians? No, He promised another thing too. "Behold, I will put a spirit in him, so that he shall hear a message (rumor, report) and return to his own land...", says the Lord (2Kings 19:7). "I will make Sennacherib return by the same road on which he came", (2Kings 19:28; Isaiah 37:29). But what kind of spirit is that, that makes the king return to his home at Nineveh, his capital city? Paul's letter to 2Timothy has an answer for this, in Chapter 1, verse 7, "..for God did not give us a spirit of cowardice...". Spirit of Cowardice! Did the king has the spirit of cowardice? Did he fear about something unusual? Yes. Now why do I say this?

In 705 BC or 704 BC, a "tupsarru", a scholar or scribe by name Nabu-zuqup-kenu, who served under Sargon-II and his son Sennacherib, writes the twelfth and the final cuneiform clay tablet of the "Epic of Gilgamesh". By this time the king Sargon-II is dead in the battlefield at Tabal, and his dead body was not recovered and was not found forever. The deceased King was not given his final rites. It is at this time that the epic of Gilgamesh is written down. The two characters in the epic had a final dialogue before one of them is confined to netherworld forever.
Gilgamesh : Did you see the one who was killed in the battle?
Enkidu : I saw him....
Gilgamesh : Did you see the one whose corpse was left lying in the open countryside?
Enkidu : I saw him. His ghost does not rest in the netherworld.
Gilgamesh : Did you see the one whose ghost has no provider of funerary offerings?
Enkidu : I saw him. He eats the scrapings from the pot and crusts of bread that are thrown away in the street.
This seems to be about Sargon-II. Isn't it?
A fragmentary clay tablet from Nineveh was written in the time of king Esarhaddon (reigned 680 - 669 BC), son of Sennacherib, tried to explain the violent deaths of his two predecessors. The modern scholars called it as "Sin of Sargon". Its there on the ORACC (Open Richly Annotated Cuneiform Corpus) website. It begins with Sennacherib pronouncing that, while he (Sennacherib) was pondering that the deeds of gods, the death of Sargon-II my father, who was slain in the enemy country and who was not interred in his house occurred to my mind. ..Sennacherib goes on to assemble a number of haruspices, splits them into groups and asks haruspex to perform liver divination to investigate the sin of Sargon my father. The haruspex determined that it was due to Sargon's neglect of the Assyrian gods and his exaggerated enthusiasm for the gods of Babylon that has brought this fate. Sennacherib tried to sought to rectify this, but his diviners prevented him from doing such plans, which might cause him to die, may be a violent death. 
However, Sennacherib met a violent death in the temple of god Nisroch later as the Lord spoke through prophet Isaiah (2Kings 19:37). Nisroch represented agriculture, fertility, protection and divine oversight. Or as some scholars think that Nisroch was misspelt for god Nusku, a God of fire and light, who serves as a divine protector and messenger. He protected people from evil demons and stop nightmares. Priests prayed him to clean and heal sick people. Either of two, whoever may be the god, where is this god, and where is his protection when Sennacherib was too worried and feared about his father's fate that befell upon him? 
The kings have to interred underground. The burial was commonly in a large stone sarcophagi. Once the king has been laid to rest, with a list of variety of grave goods like a bed, oxen, sheep, precious garments, it ends with a line, "the coffin was carefully closed and sealed". By sealing the coffin the Assyrians sought to prevent people from theft and also wanted to guarantee that the interred King would not be able to leave its final resting place and haunt the living. If they were not properly buried, Assyrians believed, the dead - especially if they had been abandoned on the battlefield after being killed there - would do just that: find their way back to those they had known in life and punish them with sickness, misery, or death. Numerous ritual texts are against ghosts of the dead are found both in Assyria and Babylonia. The inauspicious violent death of Sargon-II loomed large over Sennacherib's time in power. The fear that threatened over his heir. Every year during the month of Du'uzu (between the months of June and July) the people of Assyria and Babylonia celebrated the dead by performing rituals in honor of Tammuz, a deity who died but for those days was allowed to return from netherworld. In this scenario, Sennacherib first left the city Dur-Sharrukin, which happened to be the capital city of his father king Sargon-II. Sennacherib moved to Nineveh and never stepped back to Dur-Sharrukin in fear that the ghost of his dead father would haunt the city. He also tried to appease his father's roaming soul by attacking Gurdi, the person who is responsible for his father's death. He was not ready to accept his father's death. He tried to dedicate the restoration work of the temple of god Ashur in his father's name. He concealed his father's image under the terrace walls. Is it done out of fear or not is a never answered question. Sennacherib sacrificed massive bulls and fat sheep to regain Nergal's favour, the god of war, death and destruction and the husband of Ereshkigal, the terrifying queen of netherworld. He did all this as a kind of redemption, writes Eckart Frahm in his book "Assyria".

What it meant to be the acts of appeasement and redemption for Sennacherib, I call it as acts of fear. Sennacherib has the spirit of cowardice. He depended on sacrifices, haruspices, diviners, decamped, etc out of fear. And now, he is on the way back to Nineveh. Maybe Sennacherib saw that the attack of mice at Pelusium, and the deaths of his soldiers at the camp of Jerusalem as a bad omen. This superstitious call hurried him back to Assyria. A king who called himself great, strong, and unrivaled has met a match in the God of Judah. Not just a match but who put a bridle and a bit in his nose and mouth and haste him decamp the Holy City. A king who boasted as who strikes his enemies with lightning, is now in a lightning speed back to Nineveh.

Paul writes, "God has not given us a spirit of fear..." (2Timothy 1:7). The Greek word translated fear is used in extrabiblical literature to refer to a person who fled from battle. It is a strong term for cowardice. Boldness is the mark of the Holy Spirit (CSB). "We should not be ashamed of the testimony of our Lord", (2Timothy 1:8). Maybe the kings of this earth take their stand and the rulers assemble against the Lord and against His Messiah, but the Lord will grant us the Holy Spirit to speak His testimonies with boldness (Acts 4:26,29). Let's close this write-up from the Proverbs of Solomon, which king Hezekiah collected and copied, "The wicked flee when no one is persuing them, but the righteous are as bold as a lion" (Proverbs 28:). 

* All the Bible Scriptures are taken from NLT, other than a few from ESV, CSB, and NRSV.
* Pictures are taken from "Life is a Sacred text" website.

Wednesday, 21 January 2026

Daniel - From the Pride of Lions' to the Godly Pride.

                       Picture by Briton Riviere

Letter to Hebrews 11:33 reads, "They shut the mouths of lions". Who shut the lions mouth? No no, it's not St.Ignatius of Antioch who became a martyr, was chained and fed to lions in a Roman Colosseum probably in AD 110. Though there is no written record about this, but the tradition remember this event as part of the Church history.
So whom does the Letter to Hebrews 11:33 talk about? It's about Prophet Daniel. This is happening in the power transition period from Babylonian to Median and then to Persians. Daniel was a young man probably around the age of 15 when he was taken as captive to Babylon. Book of Daniel 1:1 reads, that Daniel was taken captive in the third year of Jehoiakim of Judah (probably from 609 - 598 BC), maybe in 605 BC by Nebuchadnezzar-2 (605 - 562 BC), when he was a co-regent with his father Nabopolassar (626 - 605 BC). 2Kings 24:14 and Book of Jeremiah 24:1, reads that Nebuchadnezzar-II took the best craftsmen, metalsmiths to Babylon. In Book of Daniel 1:3-4 reads, those of the captives who are good looking, suitable for instruction in all wisdom, knowledgeable, are chosen to serve at king's palace. Daniel is one among the captives (Daniel 1:7) including Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego. Daniel served all through the Babylonian empire till it was conquered by the Medes and the Persians (605 - 535 BC?). From Nebuchadnezzar-2, his son Evil-Merodach (2Kings25:27) also known as Amel-Marduk (562 - 560 BC) took over the reign. After him Neriglissar (560 - 556 BC) probably who married the daughter of Nebuchadnezzar-2 resigned over. After his death his son Labashi-Marduk, a child king took over for two or three months (556 BC). Nabonidus (556 - 539 BC), probably who married one of the daughter's of Nebuchadnezzar-2 was the last official king to reign over Babylon, though he was never on the throne. His son, crown prince Belshazzar (539? BC) was partying when Cyrus the Great or Cyrus-2 (King of Persia 559 - 530 BC; King of Media 549 - 530 BC) conquered Babylon in 539 BC with the help of the Medians (Median empire: 700 - 550 BC).

So now that the Babylonian empire fell to the combined forces of Medians and Persians - in this context, who is Darius the Mede (Daniel 5:31)? He is said to be the son of Xerxes (or in Hebrew called as Ahasuerus) in Daniel 9:1. So who is Darius the Mede? Other than the Book of Daniel, he is not mentioned in the works of Herodotus or Ctesias of Cnidus. Scholars tried to fit Darius the Mede with General Gabaru a Babylonian who helped Cyrus-2 to conquer the city Babylon, some with Ugbaru, the commander and governor of Gutium who led Persian army into Babylon, and some said Darius is an another name for Cyrus-2, and some with Astyages son of Cyaxares, the last king of Medes, before Persians took over Media. These are all speculations. Cardiff University Professor of Ancient History, Lloyd Llewellyn-Jones, writes in his book "Persians" that, ".. throughout the Achaemenid period, Medes were routinely appointed to high office at the Persian court." Whoever this Darius might be, he is now the king or the governor of Babylon. Moreover, Medes were the conquerors of Babylon was backed up by verses from Isaiah 13:17, 21:28; and Jeremiah 51:11,28. Daniel 5:28, emphasizes the Aramaic word "peres", which means "division" of Babylon between Medes and Persians.

For someone ending up in a lions den is unthinkable. If that too as a punishment is gruesome. In the Babylonian empire though there are some brutal punishments for culprits, the punishment of humans or guilty criminals as feed to the lions is unheard of. Then where did this kind of punishment come from? We can draw some insights from their predecessors, the Assyrian empire.
After killing Sennacherib's son Ashur-nadin-shumi (700 -694 BC) puppet king of Babylon, the Elamite king Hallushu-Inshushinak-2 (699 - 693 BC) gave charges of Babylon to Nergal-ushezib (694 - 693 BC). In 693 BC, on their way back to secure the borders from rebellion at Uruk, a Babylon-Elamite border, he came across Hallushu-Inshushinak-2's son and Nergal-ushezib at Nippur. Sennacherib killed Hallushu-Inshushinak-2's son and captured Nergal-ushezib. Sennacherib (704 - 681 BC), brought him to Nineveh, put him on display at the gate leading to citadel, chained him together with a wild bear that would slowly devour him. It was one of the gruesome spectacles that was done on regular basis, writes Eckart Frahm in his book "Assyria".
In an another incident from the same book, Ashurbanipal (668 - 631 BC), along with his people, would watch the terror that he had devised to punish his opponents at the Citadel Gate at Nineveh. Ashurbanipal records about a punishment he gave to Arab ruler Uaite (Yauta), "I placed him in a neck-stock, bound him up with a bear and dog, and made guard the Citadel Gate of Nineveh."*
Ashurbanipal has also a hobby of hunting lions. Travellers around Nineveh feared lions. Though it was unlikely that Ashurbanipal hunted, but the royal servants made an arena (like a Roman arena) where hunting takes place. The space around was protected during lion hunts, by two solid rows of soldiers armed with long spears and bows, and in addition guarded by a number of large dogs. A sculpture relief illustrates how the lion hunt in Nineveh arena was carried out. First, a child or a small adult released the lions from a cage. The king then killed them one by one, shooting his arrows from the royal chariot while racing around the arena. Citizens watched this spectacle from a nearby  hill, while men carrying waterskins sold them drinks. After the hunt, Ashurbanipal would pour libations of wine over the slain lions to goddess Ishtar. Historian Eckart Frahm believes that the lions released into the Nineveh arena were probably well fed - and perhaps even sedated - when they were unleashed to face the merciless weapons of the Assyrian king.
From the above texts, we can infer that it was an act of spectacle to watch the guilty persons who were chained along with the wild animals, so that they can devour them slowly. We don't know whether we have such an arena present in Babylon or not. But we have a clear picture of such a merciless acts that were enjoyed by the king as well as the people.

Daniel who is now an 80 or 90 years old man, had been a high officer of the Babylonian Empire throughout its whole 70 years and continued to serve the Medes and Persian empires as well. Daniel, right from his surrender to the old age, he had been a faithful person in his faith (Daniel 1:8; 6:11). Nabonidus (556 - 539 BC), the last Babylonian king characterized the Medes as barbarians. One such barbarian(?) king Darius the Mede appointed Daniel over 120 satraps. This made other satraps and administrators jealous over Daniel. They wanted find a charge or corruption against Daniel, but they couldn't. Verse 6:5 reads, "these men said, "we will never find any charge against this Daniel unless we find something against him concerning the law of his God". So, they went to the king and forced to make an ordinance that for 30 days, people should only come to you for petitions and should not go to any other God or man. If they did, they should be thrown into lions' den. They saw Daniel praying and praising God thrice a day ignoring the active ordinance. Hence proven guilty, and "as the law of the Medes and Persians, is irrevocable and cannot be changed (Daniel 6:8,12,15)", Daniel was thrown into the lions' den and sealed, though Darius didn't like it. The next day early morning Daniel was taken out out of lions' den unharmed (Daniel 6:19 - 21). The very next moment, those who complained maliciously against Daniel, with their wives and children, were thrown into lions' den, and the lions devoured them even before they reached the bottom of the den (Daniel 6: 22 - 25). This is all written in Daniel 6th chapter.

From the above reading, we can match some clues with the Nineveh arena of Assyrian empire. According to "Josephus Antiquities", this is happening at Ecbatana the capital of Median empire. That the arena is round and has a opening on the top of it and it's for public spectacle. And about the question of sedation to the lions. The first answer would be, why would Darius be so anxious and go without eating all through the night? (Daniel 6:18). There is a better answer in "The Complete Works of Josephus, The Antiquities of the Jews, Book 10.11.260-262, "Now when his (Daniel) enemies saw that Daniel had suffered nothing which was terrible, they would not own that he was preserved by God, and by his providence; but they said that the lions had been filled full with food, and on that account it was, as they supposed, that the lions would not touch Daniel, nor come to him; and this they alleged to the king; but the king, out of an abhorrence of their wickedness, gave order that they should throw in a great deal of flesh to the lions; and when they had filled themselves, he gave farther order that Daniel's enemies should be cast into the den that he might learn whether the lions, now they were ful, would touch them or not; ....for the lions spared none of them, but tore them all to pieces, as if they had been very hungry and wanted food". Hence the question of sedation of lions or fully fed lions is answered.

Now, let's come back to the Letter to Hebrews 11:33, who shut the mouths of lions? Daniel answering Darius says, "My God sent His angel and shut the lions' mouths; and they haven't harmed me, for I was found innocent before Him" (Daniel 6:22). 
"Who can say, "I have kept my heart pure; I am cleansed from my sin?" (Proverbs 20:9). No one can dare to say that. The only way to renew yourself is by reconciliation with Christ. "Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation; the old has passed away, and see, the new has come" (2Corinthians 5:17). As we have escaped the snout of the lion which is satan who is prowling around to devour (1Peter 5:8), we can now proudly say, "from the pride of lions' to the Godly pride".

Additional information:
*The gate also served as the place where the severed head of the Elamite king Teumman (664 - 653 BC) was displayed to the public after it had been hung around the neck of the Gambulean leader Dunanu, who had to parade it around the city, later who was slaughtered later like a lamb. And it was at the Citadel Gate that the two sons of Nabu-shumu-eresh, a governor of Nippur who had sided with the Elamites, were forced to grind the bones of their father. These are some of the texts taken from Ashurbanipal records.

Monday, 29 December 2025

A Mystifying Message Of Christmas.

A Mystifying Message Of Christmas - 
Why didn't the Scribes and Chief priests not understand the prophecy or reveal it until the king Herod enquired?
Jesus said, "Woe to you, Scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! You shut the door of the Kingdom of heaven in people's faces. For you don't go in, and you don't allow those entering to go in" (Matt.23:13).
Even if the Pharisees and the Scribes knew, they won't let it reveal it out. But when the Wise men asked they had to reveal about the birth and the place of Jesus. Prophecies sometimes may be ambiguous and hold a secret inherently.

Of course there is an interesting wordplay in the prophecies of the Prophets -
For example, Isaiah 11:1 reads, "Then a shoot will grow from the stump of Jesse, and a Branch from his roots will bear fruit." Here, the Hebrew word "Branch" "× ֵצֶר" (netser), is the Promised King, who shoots out as a new branch. The same word, "× ֵצֶר" has the same root for "Nazareth". After the king Herod's death, as said by the angel, "..he went and settled in a town called Nazareth to fulfill what was spoken through the prophets, that He would be called a Nazarene" (Matt 2:23).

In another example of wordplay, "This is what the Lord of the Arimes says: Here is a man whose name is Branch; he will branch out from his place and build the Lord's temple" (Zech 6:12). In the Septuagint Version, the word, "Branch" (ἀνατολή Gk, anatole) was translated as, "East". Now this becomes interesting - the Magi comes from the east (Matt 2:1) to king Herod saying that, "we saw His star at its rising and have come to worship Him" (Matt 2:2). "The East, on the one hand , generally held the Magi to be kings... Now, the Magi themselves, on recognising Him (Jesus), honoured Him with gifts, and adored Him on bended knee as Lord and King" writes Tertullian in AD 197 (160-230 AD) (ANF 3.162). Clement of Alexandria (150-215 AD) writes, "Those who composed the Persics related that in the highlands, in the country of the Magi, three mountains are situated on an extended plain. Those who travel through the locality, on coming to the first mountain, hear a confused sound as if of several legions shouting in the battle array" (AD 195) (ANF 2.488).
What is this unusual sound that the Magi heard as they came across the first mountain when they started to follow the Star in the East? Can this might be as Luke recorded "..a great company of the heavenly host appeared with the angel, praising God and saying, 'Glory to God in the highest heaven, and on earth peace to those on whom his favor rests'" (Lk 2:13,14). The multitude of heavenly host in other words is the heavenly army. Why would a heavenly host glorify Jesus? As said by an angel to Mary, "You will conceive and give birth to a son, and you are to call him Jesus. He will be great and will be called the Son of the Most High. The Lord will give him the throne of his father David, and he will reign over Jacob's descendants forever; his kingdom will never end" (Lk 1:31-33).

To summarise the Scribes and Chief priests though having the knowledge of Jesus' birth and his place of birth didn't reveal about this to the  king Herod until the Magi who started from the East guided by the Star who on their way witnessed the unusual sounds which might be the praises of angelic host that Shepherds witnessed until they reached Jerusalem. On reaching Bethlehem as said by the Scribes and Chief priests, the sorcerer magi came with gifts like gold, frankincense, and myrrh which were the standard way of honouring a king or god [King Seleucus II Callinicus offered to God Apollo at the temple in Miletus in 243 BC].

Sometimes, we too may be too stubborn as Chief priests and Scribes to recognize and accept Jesus as our Lord and Savior or might postpone which might cost our life. So, "..now is the acceptable time; now is the day of salvation!" (2Cor 6:2).
Merry Christmas.

* ANF - Ante Nicene Fathers.

Tuesday, 2 December 2025

Nehushtan, The Cross, And The Hadza Tribe - A Nous.

Nehushtan, The Cross, And The Hadza Tribe - A Nous.


1Peter 2:24 reads, "He Himself bore our sins in his body on the tree; so that, having died to sins, we might live for righteousness."
Colossians 2:14 reads, "He (Jesus) erased the certificate of debt, with it's obligations, that was against us and opposed to us, and has taken it away by nailing it to the Cross."
Romans 6:10 reads, "For the death He died, He died to sins once for all time; ..."
John 19:30 reads, "It is finished."

The above verses all point to the Cross of Christ on the Calvary and the work of the Redemption and the Salvation that Jesus did for our sake. In other words or the way I understood it as, "There is no sin beyond the Cross of Calvary; absolutely no sin". The Cross of Christ is the prophetical fulfillment of the Brazen Serpent of Moses.
Book of Numbers 21:4-9, gives us an idea of sin, it's consequence and the redemption of the sin. The Israelites murmured against God and His will, the consequence was that, they were bitten by poisonous vipers. The remedy is looking upto the Bronze Snake that Moses made according to the Lord's saying and installed it on the pole; and whoever saw that in faith were recovered and lived. This Brazen Snake that was installed on a pole continued to be a standard of healing amidst Israelites till king Hezekiah (approximately 715/716 - 687/686 BC). It was at this moment that Sennacherib (705 - 681 BC) king of Assyria, launched a war against Judah in 701 BC. King Hezekiah asked God for forgiveness and, "He removed the high places, shattered the sacred pillars, and cut down the Asherah poles. He broke into pieces the Bronze Snake that Moses made, for until then Israelites were burning incense to it. It was called Nehushtan ["nahash" (Heb) means Snake; "nehset" (Heb) means Bronze] 2Kings 18:4.

The archaeological evidence of 8th century BC records, "two bullae" (clay seals) which seems to be royal seals depict features of winged serpents with names of the cities Tza'ananim (Judges 4:11) and Apheka (Joshua 15:53) on each of the bullae, which are mentioned in the Bible.

In another archaeological evidence of the same time in the city of ancient Calah (Nimrud), archaeologist Austen Layard (1817-1894) found from Sennacherib's booty (Assyrian king in the time of king Hezekiah) a bronze bowl depicted with two snakes with wings mounted on poles. Among the same group of items, was a bowl with the name "I'hyw", corresponding to "YHWH", the sacred name of the Lord on the rim of the bowl. It was a Judean booty taken by the king Sennacherib in 8th century BC.
This is a clear evidence that Sennacherib has attacked Judah. However, our interest is not about the evidence or the booty he collected, but about the "Nehushtan", which is a prelude to the "Cross of Calvary". "Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the wilderness, so the Son of Man must be lifted up" (John 3:14).

Today, in a world of innovations, science, and robotics, it might be difficult for someone to believe in such a redemptive plan of God for us. But an African tribe belief in a technique or in an operation will help us understand the redemptive plan of God. The "Hadza tribe"(?) ["Hadzabe" as known by the locals] of northern Tanzania are known for hunting poisonous snakes for food apart from other animals like antelopes, wild boar, baboons etc. What's interesting is this part, as they have no permanent houses they used to live in the hallowed-out or the burl of a Boabab tree. They even dry the hunted meat, store honey on the branches of the tree. They sometimes make delicacies with the fruit of the tree. In a simple sentence, the Boabab tree is an essential lifeline as well as sacred to them. These tribes, sometimes hang dead snakes on the lintel of their tree houses. They believe that by doing so, they would keep the other poisonous snakes like Puff Adder from entering their house. This would also secure their food on the top of the tree as well. It really works for them (Watch videos - the links provided at the bottom of the article).

My point here is to make you understand how by doing a task will keep you secure and peaceful. This is the same application with the Cross of Calvary too. By laying His life, Jesus kept us safe and secure from sin and it's consequences. "It is finished" (John 19:30) for sin now, and as said above "There is no sin beyond the Cross of Calvary; absolutely no sin". By His Sacrifice, we can now live confidently. We are free from Hell, and now, Heaven is our eternal home forever. Come to Jesus now, and make Him your Lord and Savior. 
God bless.

https://share.google/FJKBouKWLMgB6ule9
https://www.facebook.com/share/r/1ACeybf7iz/

Sunday, 16 November 2025

Psalm 23:5 and The Eucharist - An Insight.

Psalm 23:5 and The Eucharist - An Insight. 

The Book of Psalms 23:5 reads, "You prepare a table before me in the presence of my enemies. You anoint my head with oil; my cup overflows".

My cup over flows -

What is the significance of over flowing someone's cup? Why should someone do that? Is there any message in doing so? Let us unlock the understanding by looking into few historical cultural contexts.

In Persian royal culture, as the dinner drew to a close, a few special guests were summoned by a eunuch to approach the king and to drink in his company. This was a mark of exceptional distinction because it was during these drinking bouts that important matters of state were discussed - and personal ambitions might be realised. The courtier honoured with a regular place at the king's table was known as a "homotrapezus" (‘messmate’) a very rare and enviable title held by trusted nobles of the highest rank. The word "homotrapezus" is a Latin transliteration of a Greek word, likely combining the Greek prefix homo (meaning "same" or "equal") with a form of the Greek word trapeza (meaning "table" or "bank").

My comments on "Overflowing the Cup" - Dining with the King has a purpose and only a very few courtiers or delegates will attend and share the table with the King.

If the King says to the Wine dispenser to stop pouring wine into a person's cup, it means that the King has nothing to discuss with him apart from this and he may leave the table; if someone's cup is filled to the brim, this means that there is something more to discuss with him; and if someone's cup is overflowed, this means that the King likes your association and wants you to share his table till the end.

This is the significance of sharing the table with the King.

What has this to do with Psalms 23:5? The answer lies in the Eucharist, which we take part in the remembrance of the Wounded Body and the Sacrificial Blood of Jesus on the Cross of Calvary for our sins (1 Corinthians 11:24-26).

When we part take in the Eucharist, it is like God our Eternal King, sharing His Cup filled to the brim or overflowing our cup has a significance. Every time we receive the Eucharist, it is our Lord saying to us or wanting from us to have a continuous relationship with Him. He is more interested and wants us to be in fellowship with Him, and never want us to leave the table. He wants us to enjoy the association with Him. The Lord wants us to understand one more important thing - sharing the table with us has an important indication, you are sanctified and consecrated to part take in the Lord's Table, or in other words you are too important to be ignored by the Lord Himself. See what a beautiful thing this is.

Now the question is, whom do you want to associate with - in a God who left you to your fate, or in a God who wants to save you and always keeps you by His side? The choice is up to you. 

God bless.

Friday, 7 November 2025

Esther - A Queen In The Making.

The Coronation of Queen Esther, from the 1617 Scroll of Esther from Ferrara, Italy.

The story starts with a Benjaminite, a Jew, by name Mordecai was taken one among many captives by king Nebuchadnezzar-II (605-562 BC) of Babylon after the destruction of Jerusalem in the year 587/6 BC (Es.2:5,6).  It is just a hypothesis that, along with Mordecai, Esther's parents might have also moved or else they might have been born and married in the exile itself, and Esther was born in the exile too. The events of the Book of Esther might have happened between 486 - 465 BC. From the distruction of Jerusalem to the king Xerxes-I of the Book of Esther is atleast 108 years. By this time Mordecai is been an old man and Esther in her adolescent age. Mordecai might have been an abled and skilled person who impressed Nebuchadnezzar-II and was taken captive (2Ki.24:14), and was been in the service of the king's court since then, till the time of Xerxes-I (Es.2:5).

Before giving the big banquet by king Ahasuerus (Xshayarasha - Persian name) (probably king Xerxes-I) to the Satraps of 127 provinces, the king has returned from War on Greece in 479 BC unsatisfactory to the city of Susa. The War on Greece started in the year 480 BC. In his inscriptions in the city of Persepolis we find the king's territorial expansion. "Xerxes the king proclaims: By the favour of Ahuramazda, these are the countries of which I was King outside Persia; I ruled them; they bore me tribute. What was said to them by me, that they did. The law that was mine, that held them firm: Media, Elam, Arachosia, Armenia, Drangiana, Parthia, Areia, Bactria, Sogdiana, Chorasmia, Babylonia, Assyria, Sattagydia, Lydia, Egypt, Ionians who dwell by the Sea and those who dwell beyond the Sea, the Maka people, Arabia, Gandara, Indus, Cappadocia, Dahae, Scythians, (Saka) who drink haoma, Scythians (Saka) who wear pointed hats, Thrace, the Akaufaka people, Libyans, Carians, Nubians" (XPh). It is undeniable that the territory that king Xerxes-I reigned was very vast. In his grand, lavish banquet, the king wanted his queen to show-off her beauty in the midst of the Satraps, which she ignored. The reason is that, the costumes of those times were accentuated (make more noticeable and prominent). The textile was tailored to emphasize and noticeable a particular feature of the body. Vasthi in ancient Indo-Iranian means "Vashishta, meaning 'the best'". She kept her spirit and because she refused to listen to the king, she was not allowed to enter in the king's presence, and her royal position is to be given to another suitable and more worthy woman (Es.1:15-19). This is how God planned to bring in Esther into the royal court.

The harem has a special importance in Persian royal house. Queen, other wives, concubines, their children lived in the harem. The harem is the most secured place with high fortification walls and well guarded with soldiers. Usually the harem is attached to the king's quarters. Xerxes-I palace was connected to the royal harem by two grand, well-worked flights of stairs, which must have been utilised  by the king when he required direct access to the rooms below. The queen plays an important role in the harem. Under her jurisdiction lies the concubines and others. The king is under huge pressure to beget sons. The place of the queen is unstable if the king finds a favoured woman. She if be a concubine by giving birth to a son can gain some hierarchy in her position. Sexual relations between the king and the chosen women of the harem were embedded in complex politics of dynastic reproduction. The queen, the future king's mother held highest place of authority among all the women of the harem. Plutarch wrote, "no one shared the table of Persian king, except his mother or his consort, the queen seated below him, the mother above him". The mothers, consorts, and other women in the orbit of the great king had real influence. 


Now that the queen Vashti's place is empty, 
"Let a search be made for beautiful young virgins for the king. ...bring all these beautiful young women into the harem at the citadel of Susa", (Es.2:2,3). It is a royal practice whereby scouts and spies were sent across the empire to bring back to court pretty girls who might be trained in the arts of music, poetry, and beauty to become royal concubines. Concubinage was a difficult existence. Many concubines were trained by eunuch overseers and senior women to be skilled musicians, cultured dancers, and brilliant storytellers. Concubines were not prostitutes. Concubines tended to oscillate between pleasure-women and women of state. Darius-I (522 - 486 BC), the father of Xerxes-I (the king of the Book of Esther), at the end of his period selected his fiftieth girl from the harem as his latest love interest. Concubinage could lead to a stable relationship with the king. An established concubine would find prestige and honour within the harem when children she had brone the king were officially acknowledged as his heirs. Concubines were supposed to be physically appealing since the arousal of desire in the ruler was essential. Antigonism between concubines and between wives and concubines was common. Women who had sexual relationship with the king would have had greater status than those who had no access to his bed. The life of these women were not for themselves, but for creating other lives. They were required to keep intact the dynasty, and secure future generations to come. King Artaxerxes-I had atleast 18 sons with concubines, and Artaxerxes-II had no fewer than 150 sons. The birth of a son would terminate the concubine's sexual relationship with the ruler. If the concubine gave the king a series of daughter's, then their sexual relationship could continue, but once the couple were blessed with a son sexual relationship ceased and the ruler moved on to a new concubine. Darius-II, son of Artaxerxes-I was the son of a Babylonian concubine. 
Such was the competition into which God had let His elect Esther for the emancipation of His people. How did God established Esther in a world of carnal and sensual competitors? How did Esther find favour in the eyes of Xerxes-I? Was it sensual or did God had a special plan to find favour for her in the eyes of the king? 

Here comes out protagonist Esther. As read above she was young adolescent girl who was much sought after for the king by his scouts and spies (Rs.2:2,3). Her father is Abihail (Es.2:15). The Jewish Midrash adds that Esther’s father died during her mother’s pregnancy, and her mother died during childbirth (Esther Rabbah 6:5; BT Megillah 13a). As a result of her mother’s death, Mordecai had adopted Esther. Esther's hebrew name is Hadassah, the name of "myrtle tree" (hadas). Her gentile name is Esther derived from the name of famous goddess Ishtar. The name Esther is a Persian origin, which means "star" (stara). Esther was so called because she was righteous, and the righteous are called “myrtles”; she was of average height, like a myrtle, which is neither short nor long; she had a greenish (sallow) complexion, like a myrtle (BT Megillah). Just as the myrtle is sweet-smelling but has a bitter taste, so Esther was sweet to Ahasuerus, but bitter to Haman (Esther Rabbah6:5). The myrtle has a good smell, and the myrtle does not dry out either in summer or in winter. In Achaemenid Persian culture and Zoroastrian belief, trees, especially evergreens and Plane trees, were religious symbols, often representing the "Tree of Life". Assyrian kings were frequently represented with as the "tree of life".
Another protagonist of the Book of Esther, Xerxes-I, is a great lover of nature. A cylinder seal (picture above) has Xerxes, (whose name is boldly inscribed), is shown in the act of adorning a tree with votive offerings of jewellery. He worships at the tree because it is a holy conduit where he can encounter god. A story is told in the Histories, by Herodotus, that, when Xerxes-I on his march to the war on Greece in 480 BC, on his way in the town of Kallatebos, by a roadside saw a magnificent "Plane tree". He was was smitten with love for it. He moaned over it, praised it, adored it, and loaded it with lavish gifts, like those bestowed on a lover. Xerxes-I hung the tree's branches with golden ornaments, until it's branches groaned with its weight. He arranged a man there to look after the tree, and continued on his way back to the war. Though it seems to be a bizarre story, though some ridiculed it as like Aelian, it shows how king Xerxes-I loved the nature and especially, the sweet smelling lush green trees. This very love for nature and trees of the king and the means of connecting god through these trees, is what God of the Bible used to emancipate His people. God used Hadassah for this purpose. 
Just imagine, after going through an year long intense training under the eunuchs of the harem (Es.2:12), now Esther entered the bed chamber of the king with all her expertise in cosmetics and perfumes. Standing before the king; upon seeing this beautifully dressed youthful woman, the king asks for her name. Esther replied, "I'm Hadassah". Just imagine upon listening to the name Hadassah, the king's thoughts might have filled with all the lush green, sweet smelling, godly conduit, postive nature. Even before having an another word with her, he fell in love with her. The Book of Esther 2:17, reads, "The king loved Esther more than all the other women. She won more favour and approval from him than did any of the other virgins. He placed the royal crown on her head and made her Queen in place of Vashti". This how God made Esther a queen and worked out a plan to bring back His people to the land of Jews and reconstructed His Temple in Jerusalem.

So, let's not hurry God, let us wait upon Him with faith and obedience. For He has planned good things in our life. He will fullfill everything He has promised for us. Joshua 21:45 reads, "Not one of all the LORD's good promises to Israel failed; every one was fulfilled".

- A few lines for this article are taken from "Persians, The Age of The Great King's", by Lloyd Llewellyn-Jones.

Tuesday, 30 September 2025

Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego - Old Bible story in the new light.

Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego - Old Bible story in the new light.

Most of us all are aware of this story in the Book of Daniel, 3rd Chapter. Now you may think what is new to say in this, because the story is in an active voice and in itself is like a calligram while going through it, and that's the end of it.

Is our visualisation true? Does king Nebuchadnezzar-II wanted to burn alive the three young men? Is this all what he wanted or did he wanted to torture them more? Let's find out.

Burning alive his captives or enemies is under the jurisdiction of a king. Assyrian Kings like Assurdan-II (934-912 BC), Ashurnarsipal-II (883-859 BC), and Shalmanesser-III (858-824 BC), all followed the same procedure of burning alive their captives. We don't know whether they did this act as a spectacle in an open air or not. This continued down to the Babylonian empire and to the Persians as well. To show his superiority over his subjects, and to discipline his subjects, kings generally used to torture their victims by gruesome techniques, by impaling, flaying of skin while alive etc.  

The story of Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego according to the Book of Daniel happened in the reign of king Nebuchadnezzar-II (605-562 BC). But nowhere in the history in the acts of Nebuchadnezzar-II this kind of act is recorded. Violating a king's commandment is seen as an act of indiscipline. Punishments imposed are so cruel and torturous. From the Book of Daniel, 3rd Chapter, Verse 15, we read that, "you will be thrown immediately into the blazing furnace." The king made the furnace heated seven times than the normal. The flames scorched away the soldiers who tried to throw away the three young men. Generally the kings who ruled this part of the empire wanted to take their victim's life very slowly, which would be like a lesson for others who disobey the king. But this act of throwing them into the furnace that too seven times hotter than general will kill them in minutes. Did Nebuchadnezzar-II wanted to take their life so simply for an act of disobedience or did he wanted to take the victims life very slowly by making them realize what consequence they need to face for going against his commandments. Generally they opt for second option. How would the punishment of throwing the victim into a burning furnace take life slowly?

For this we need to travel further into the time of Persians. Darius-II (423-404 BC) inflecting the punishment on his brother, Sogdianus (424-423 BC), who tried to snatch away the throne from him. The punishment for treason is to "suffocate till death". A brick wall is built enclosed on all sides. The kiln is filled with wood and the victim is tied and lowered into it and sealed. The wood will burn until the oxygen is consumed within the kiln and the fire is extinguished. From the ashes comes smoke which will suffocate the victim filling his lungs with carbon-dioxide and slowly killing him. History says that, Sogdianus was lowered into a pile of ashes and was suffocated till death.

My intuition is that, Nebuchadnezzar-II also wanted to take life of the three young victims slowly and steadily, of course expecting cries of pardon for their disobedience to his commandment. But what happened is unexpected. Even before the furnace was sealed, Nebuchadnezzar-II saw four men walking around (4:25). And when they were brought out of the kiln, they even didn't smell the smoke (4:27). The smell of the smoke is written in the Amplified Bible, NLT, CEV, and Good News Translation. This word "smoke"*, made my intuitions strong about the slow and steady killing of the victim.

Whatever maybe the process of inflicting the punishment; in the midst of the trouble - God turns suffocation through carbon-dioxide into resuscitation of life with oxygen, sadness into joy, shame into glory, a place of pain and torture into a playful area, moreover, our very God's presence with us in times of trouble.
God bless.

*PS: Martyrdom of Polycarp, disciple of Apostle John :
From the eyewitness account -
....when he prayed, something miraculous happened. The fire swirled around him, but didn't burn. Also, witnesses say it didn't smell like smoke; instead, it smelled like bread baking or incense. The people around him were amazed that he did not burn, but when the emperor saw that he was still alive, he demanded that a sword be plunged into Polycarp....

Picture above is so close to my imagination - taken from -
https://www.biblecartoons.co.uk/blog/daniel-03-the-fiery-furnace