Wednesday, 10 August 2022

Who is your Messiah? (Part 2)


Who is your Messiah? (Part 2).

In the first part we have gone through why people of Caesarea Philippi thought of Jesus as John the Baptist, others as Elijah and still some others as Jeremiah (Matt 16:13-14). We have dwelt with the parallelism of both the people. 

Now let's get in a little further. Let's continue reading Matthew 16:15-17, "But what about you?" he (Jesus) asked. "Who do you say I am?" Simon Peter answered, "You are Christ, the son of the living God." Jesus replied, "Blessed are you Simon son of Jonah, for this was not revealed to you by man, but by my Father in heaven."

Peter's immediate response of confession to Jesus question, as "Christ", and "the Son of the living God", have a national and a spiritual inherent characteristic within it. The traumatized citizens of Israel and Judah had always been under continuous invasion threats by foreign countries. They always had a hope either in their prophets or in their kings. They always waited upon someone who would bring them out of their difficult times. Judges, kings and prophets all have played the role of Messiah in their respective times. So what it really meant of Messiah?

NIV Study Bible gives a brief definition about Messiah. "Christos" (gk), is the word used for both "Christ" and "Messiah". Both words refer to the same person and the same thing, "the Anointed One". Levi or Matthew has recorded his gospel in/about 50 to 70 AD. Matthew mentions that Jesus "is called Christ", in (Matt 1:16). In fact all the synoptic gospels are written within 70 AD. The personal confessions of Jesus as "the Christ", in the gospel of Matthew and Mark is first by Peter (Matt 16:16; Mk 8:29), in gospel of Luke by the demons (Lk 4:41), and in gospel of John by the Samaritan woman (Jn 4:29,42), though Andrew had already recognized Jesus as the Messiah (Jn 1:41), he never shared the thought. Even before the gospel writers confessed, others have recognized that Jesus as "the Messiah". In the days of Jesus, people eagerly waited for coming of the promised Messiah. The life was hard, harsh under Romans. People were longing for the promised Messiah. Many arose who claimed to be the Messiah and led their followers into rebellion against the Roman state (Matt 11:12). People thought of Messiah nationally: that he would free the country from the yoke of the Romans. People thought of Messiah as a man who takeup arms and lead the armies as king (2Samuel 7:12-16). Spiritually or religiously: people thought of  Messiah as a prophet (Deut 18:15-20) or a supernatural being, who would bring righteousness upon the land. This was what people thought of Messiah. Look at the genealogy of Jesus, we can see prophets and kings as well in that. Surely, Jesus was the promised Messiah. 

Peter has not just confined to confess Jesus as the "Messiah", but also adds, "the Son of the Living God" to his credit. In Matthew 20th Chapter reading from verse 20-28, we can read Jesus confirming in v23, that the Lord is his "Father", and referring to the purpose of his coming, Jesus says, "the Son of Man did not come to be served but to serve, and to give his life as a ransom for many" (v28). John 13:1, testifies that, "Jesus knew that the time has had come for him to leave this world and go to the Father, Jesus knew that the Father had put all things under his power, and that he had come from God and was returning to God" (Jn 13:1,3). Matthew 11:27; 18:10; 18:35; 15:13, all confirm that Jesus is the "the Son of the Living God. John 3:35,13,14,15 verses read a statement by Jesus of his Sonship, and his purpose, "The father loves the Son and placed everything in his hands, No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven - the Son of Man. Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the desert, so the Son of Man must be lifted up, that everyone who believes in him may have eternal life." Jesus talking about his glorification by the Father, "He (the Father) is the one who glorifies me. You do not know Him, but I know Him" (Jn 8:54,55). There are still more verses in the gospels that will authenticate of "the Sonship of the Living God", but confined to the main subject let's leave this topic here for now.

Why do you think that Peter did make such a statement, "you are Christ, the Son of the Living God"? What made him do that? Let's read Luke 5:1-9. Jesus got into a boat at the shore of Lake Gennesaret (Sea of Galilee), that belonged to Simon (Peter). From there He taught the people. On finishing, Jesus said to row the boat a little deep into the sea. Simon answered that, they have worked hard all through the night, but have not caught one fish. Just because of Jesus' encouragement, he rowed the boat a little deeper. Simon was surprised by the amount of fish he and his friends caught. Then Simon realized by this miracle, "he knelt down in front of Jesus and said, Lord! don't come near me, I am a sinner" (v8). This is Peter's second personal encounter with Jesus. In his first encounter, when his brother Andrew called him to see the Messiah they found, and when he was coming to see, "Jesus saw him, and said, Simon son of Jona: thou shalt be called Cephas, which is by interpretation, a stone" (John 1:42). The surprising factor is that, how did Jesus knew his name? Simon never saw or knew Jesus till then, if not otherwise listening to Andrew his brother, a disciple of John the Baptist, telling about the expected Messiah, a Holy man, of whose sandals he is not worthy to untie (Jn 1:27). Now that he saw this Holy man in his own boat, witnessing a miracle personally, who in his past encounter, called him by name and redefined his name as "Cephas", is soul searching for Peter. Cephas, is a Syriac term for a stone, a rock. Peter is from Bethsaida, Gaulanitis, a district east of Sea of Galilee in the northeastern part of Israel. Syriac is one of the Aramaic dialects spoken in this part of area. And another miracle which he witnessed personally is of his mother-in-law (Matt 8:14-15). There are many other miracles that he witnessed while with Jesus, of which walking on water was his another personal experience (Matt 14:22-32), and Jesus feeding thousands of people twice (Matt 14:13-21; 15:32-38) are some impossible tasks that he eyewitnessed. May be witnessing these extraordinary events might have convinced Peter to confess, that Jesus is the "Messiah, the Son of the Living God".

What about his Messiahship?
Mark 10:45 reads, "For even the Son of man came not to be ministered unto, but to minister, and to give his life a ransom for many." The word "many", in greek is "polus", by implication it meant "for all", each individually and for all together. What was that He gave for all of us; His life as ransom. Ransom (lútron, gk), is price paid for redeeming the captives, loosing them from their bonds and setting them at liberty. Ransom is paying the fixed, precise and non-negotiable price at the right time to redeem somebody or something. The "lutróo", is not something that can be used for oneself, but for others. "lutróo", means to receive a ransom. 1Timothy 2:5,6 reads, "..the man Christ Jesus; Who gave himself a ransom for all.. in due time", Titus 2:14 reads, "..our great God and Savior Jesus Christ, who gave himself for us to redeem us from all wickedness (evil).." This Messiah, Jesus has given himself as ransom, for all the evil, by implication spiritual and social evils as well, and giving us liberty (freedom). How would we get liberated from the social evils? Apostle Paul, reminds Titus that the people who accept Jesus as their Lord and Savior are, "a people that of His (Jesus) very own, (and are) eager to do good works", (Titus 2:14). Yes, these people are eager to do what is good, good to liberate the oppressed in the society, who lack social justice. Martin Luther King Jr, a pastor, always used this implication in his sermons or in his open meetings, always questioning about the injustices that his people are facing: by lack of love, mutual respect, human dignity etc. He started off in mid 1950's, and started to see the fruit from 1954 and on, when the American court stricken off many of the laws that promote civil injustices. Galatians 5:13 reads, "For you were called to be free (freedom), brothers and sisters; only don't use this freedom as an opportunity for flesh, but by love serve one another". "To serve one another" is by which the people of Jesus acted. It all started by following the words of Jesus by his disciples. Acts 8:4 reads, "So those who scattered went on their way preaching the word". "But the holy apostles and disciples of our Savior, were scattered over the whole world: Thomas received Scythia, and John, Asia,.. Peter appears to have preached through Pontus, Galatia, Bithynia, Cappadocia, and Asia... Paul, spreading the gospel of Christ from Jerusalem to Illyricum.." writes Eusebius, in his Ecclesiastical History, crediting it to Origen. Along with the good news the Apostles also spread the good works.

Freeing slaves: Exodus 21:2; Deuteronomy 15:12-14, says about freeing of slaves, which continued to New Testament times. In Acts 6:9, which speaks of freeing of only jewish slaves from Rome, but Apostle Paul writing to Philemon about one named Onesimus, probably from Colossae (Col 4:9), to free him, and Paul takes the responsibility of repaying the amount (v18,19) if any.

Generosity towards believers:
In the days of Emperor Claudius, there was a great famine, and all the disciples according to their ability, determined to send relief to the believers in Judea (Acts 11:28,29). Like wise in, 1Cor 16:1-3; 2Cor 8:1-4; Phil 4:15-16; Rom 15:25-28, all these readings provide evidence for the generosity towards the believers in Jerusalem, from Macedonia, Achaia, etc.
Such were the good works that the believers imbibed by the teachings of Jesus. From then on the Messiahship continued, with these attributes passed on from generation to generation till now.

How did this Messiahship help India?
Showing obedience to the great commission that Jesus commanded, "All authority has been given to me in heaven and on earth. Go, therefore, and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe everything I have commanded you..." (Matt 28:18-20). Here the commandment "to observe everything", includes the "eagerness to do good works" also (Titus 2:14), or putting them to practice. As read above, the Apostles scattered (Acts 8:4) throughout the world. According to tradition Apostle Thomas and Apostle Andrew were believed to have come to India, like wise, Apostle Peter, Apostle Paul, Apostle Simon the Zealot (Matt 10:4), Joseph of Arimathea, visited Gaul and Britain. (or) If Peter has been to Rome, he may have come out when Emperor Claudius has expelled Jews from Rome (Acts 18:2). It is said that Apostle Peter and Paul had a close association with (Rufus)Pudens and Claudia (husband and wife, 2Tim 4:22), where Pudens were from the family line of Caractacus or Caradog who fought with Emperor Claudius (AD 41-54) father of Emperor Nero. They were brought to Rome and later the Pudens setteled in Rome. Eubulus, Pudens, Linus, Claudia (2Tim 4:22) are all Latin names and Latin is the official language of Wales (part of UK). Other ancient records state that the children of Claudia and Rufus Pudens were raised at the knees of Peter and Paul and other disciples. (For more information on this, William Steuart McBirnie, The Search for the Twelve Apostles)." The International Standard Bible Encyclopaedia also states that, "There is an interesting conjecture regarding Pudens and Claudia, that they were husband and wife, and the Claudia was of British birth, a daughter of a British King called Cogidunus. King Cogidunus was an ally of the Romans, and assumed the name of the emperor Tiberius Claudius, who was his patron. In this way his daughter would be named Claudia", although this is a supposition which lacks both evidence and proof. The 3rd and 4th century AD show the first archaeological evidence and credible records showing a community large enough to maintain churches and bishops" (History of Christianity in Britain, Wikipedia, Aug 05, 2022). With the arrival of Saxons, Angles and Jutes from Germany and Denmark, christianity extinguished. However, the faith continued in Wales and Scotland. Following the Justinian's plague (caused by Yersinia pestis bacterium) around 547 AD, the expansion of christianity resumed throughout England" (History of Christianity in Britain, Wikipedia, Aug 05, 2022). That's how the faith and the observance of the good works have been imbibed by the people of Britain. 

Mahatma Gandhi on Christian missionaries - writing in his weekly english newpaper "Harijan", started in 1933 published till 1948. In his March 29, 1935 edition, responding to a question asked by a christian missionary, on the most effective way of preaching the Gospel of Christ, Gandhi answered, "to live the Gospel is the most effective way, ..I get suspecious of missionaries who preach. But I love those who never preach, but live the life according to their lights. Their lives are silent yet most effective testimonies. Therefore, I cannot say what to preach, but I can say that a life of service and uttermost simplicity is the best preaching"
..answering to an another question, Gandhi responds, "A rose does not need to preach. It simply spreads it's fragnance. The fragnance is it's own sermon..". 
to which a counter question was asked, "..Now as for Harijans, who have no solace to get from Hinduism, how are we to meet their spiritual needs?" To which Gandhi responds,"By behaving just like the rose."
To which the missionary asked again, "But supposing someone asked us: "when did you get the scent?", Gandhi answered, "The rose, if it had sense and speech, would say: "Fool, don't you see that I got it from my Maker?" ".
(Taken from, "Lead, Kindly Light, Gandhi on Christianity", Ed by Robert Ellsberg, pgs 51,52, October 2019).

Yes, as the rose spreads it's fragnance, so the christian missionaries who got this fragnance from their "Maker" also came to spread the light, as Gandhi said, to those oppressed and downtrodden people in India. The necessary medicine that they prescribed for this bitter, venomous evils in the society was "the good works as commissioned by Jesus". Jesus said, "A good tree produces only good fruit, and a bad tree produces bad fruit. You can tell what a tree is like by the fruit it produces" (Matt 12:33).

Antidotes of the "fragnance of the Maker"  -

William Carey (missionary) - "In the latter 1700s and early 1800s in India, only children of certain social strata received education, and even that was limited to basic accounting and Hindu religion. Only the Brahmins and writer castes could read, and then only men, women being completely unschooled. Carey started Sunday Schools in which children learned to read using the Bible as their textbook. In 1794 Carey opened, at his own cost, what is considered the first primary school in all of India. The public school system that Carey initiated expanded to include girls in an era when the education of the female was considered unthinkable. Carey's work is considered to have provided the starting point of what blossomed into the Christian Vernacular Education Society providing English medium education across India" (William Carey, missionary, Wikipedia, Aug 05, 2022). He was also the most prominent campaigners to end the practice of "Sati" (Bengal Sati Regulation, 1829, Wikipedia, Aug 06, 2022).

Some more Antidotes for Social evils in India -

●1773 - East India Company passed Regulating Act where Judiciary was based on equality.
●1795 - through Article 11 British made law by which Shudras were able to posses wealth.
●1804 - through Article 3 British banned "Female Foeticide/Infanticide".
●1813 - British made law and gave "Right to Education" to the people of all Castes and Religions.
●1813 - Abolised Slavery.☆
●1817 - British made "Uniform Civil Code" (before this punishment was on the basis of Varna).
●1819 - by Article 7 "Purification" of the Shudra women was banned (after the marriage of a Shudra bride instead of going to her husband's house, she has to go to the house of Brahmin and serve him atleast three nights).
●1820 - "Ryotwari System" was first introduced by Thomas Munro in Madras Presidency. Lord Hastings (1813 - 1823) was the Governor General when Ryotwari System was introduced. This made ryots were given land ownership. The government would set taxes rate and collect taxes directly from ryots. This system was expanded to Bombay Presidency as well.
●1829 - In the month of December (17th), "Sati" (Sautee) was abolished.
●1830 - "Human Sacrifices" was banned (to appease gods and goddesses Brahmins used to sacrifice Shudra men and women banging their heads in the temple).
●1833 - Article 87 Discrimination in Government Services was banned (either on the basis of birth, religion, caste or complexion).
●1835 - British banned Sacrifice of First Son to the Ganges.
●1835 - March 7th, Lord McCauley made English as the language of Higher Education.
●1835 - Law gave Shudras to sit on chair.
●1848 - J.E.D.Baton opened school for girls.
●1854 - British opened three Universities in Calcutta, Madras and Bombay.
●1902 - University Commission was constituted.
●1860 - October 6th, British formulated Indian Penal Code.
Lord McCauley set free the Shudras who were shackled and implemented Uniform Criminal Law irrespective of Caste, Varna, or Religion.
●1863 - British made a Law and banned "Charak Puja" (while building Palaces and Bridges, Shudras were sacrificed alive. It was believed that because of this the Palaces and Bridges would last for longer times).
●1871 - British started "Caste-based Census" in India, this continued till 1941. In 1948, Jawaharlal Nehru made a law and stopped it.
●Britishers created "Mahar and Chamar Regiments" and recruited them in the Army. But because of the pressure by Brahmins, recruitment of the Untouchables in the army was stopped in 1892.
●1918 - British sent Southborugh Committee to India. This committee came for giving representation to all Castes in the Legislature. Upon prodding by Shahu Maharaja, the leader of Backward Classes Bhaskarrao Jadhav and the leader of Untouchables Dr.B.R.Ambedkar, gave memorandum to the commission for representation to their people in Legislature.
●1919 - banned appointment of Brahmins as Judges. They said Brahmins do not have Judicial character.
●1925 - "Devadasi System" was abolished by Lord Reading (1947 - Dr.Muthu Lakshmi).*

This is how the Messiahship of Jesus worked in India. The fragnance that gave liberty, hope and fraternity to the people of India. The people of Galilee comparing Jesus with their prophets, who are their leaders and thought of Him as they have comeback again. However, they were wrong in expecting Jesus to be one, because Jesus says that, "He was greater than Solomon", and "He was there before Abraham was"  (Matt 12:42; Jn 8:58). Such was our Messiah. The question remained is, who is your Messiah and what is his Messiahship to be like?

☆Post Script - 
Willam Wilberforce, an evangelical christian, (whose mother and grandfather were staunchly Church of England members) was a british politician, who headed the parliamentary campaign against the British slave trade for 20 years until the passage of the "Slave Trade Act of 1807". Wilberforce took the data that was personally enquired by Thomas Clarkson, an abolitionist campaigner and first historian of the British abolition movement. Clarkson was a son of a Reverend in the Church of England. He was an ordained deacon but never proceeded to priest's orders. He helped found "The Society for Effecting the Abolition of Slave Trade" and helped achieve passage of the Slave Trade Act 1807, which ended the British trade in slaves. Clarkson travelled 35,000 miles across Brtain to some of the slave cities such as Bristol, Liverpool, London and able to get vast numerical data that confirmed the brutality of the "Middle Passage", the stage in which millions of Africans were transported in slave ships across Atlantic to the Americas. Using the information he had received from interviews with over 20,000 sailors, Clarkson was able to accurately calculate the mortality rate aboard slave vessels (ships), by the time they had reached the other side of the Atlantic. This information was used by William Wilberforce in his speech to the "House of Commons" in 1789. The physical evidence had slave chains, leg-shackles, thumbscrews, branding irons of the intials of owners, and whips. The autobiography of Olaudah Equiano, published in 1789, were used as pamphlets, in anti-slavery campaign. The campaign printed 7,000 copies of a plan of a slave ship known as "Brooks" illustrating the inhumane and cramped conditions endured by Africans aboard a vessel (ship) that sailed from Liverpool to Jamaica in the late 18th century. By the end of 1780 they gathered millions of signatures, petitions, with this information William Wilberforce could now lobby those in power. Thomas Clarkson's friend, Josiah Wedgewood, a Unitarian believer, a supporter of the anti-slavery casuse designed a logo, for Clarkson's, The Society for Effecting the Abolition of Slave Trade and had them widely distributed, which there by became a popular and celebrated image. The Wedgewood anti-slavery medallion was the most famous image of "a black slave knelt and shackled, seen uttering the words, "Am I not a man and a brother"" in all 18th century art, which was fashioned by William Hackwood or Henry Webber. William Wilberforce after the Slave Trade Act 1807, continued for a little time and resigned in 1826 due to health reasons. But he continued his involvement for the complete abolition of slavery, led to the "Slavery Abolition Act 1833", which abolished slavery in most of the British Empire. Wilberforce died after 3 days of this Act's approval. 
[Compilation of information from Wikipedia pages, William Wilberforce, Thomas Clarkson, Josiah Wedgewood, (on Aug 10, 2022), and article "5 Key Campaigning Tools  used by Abolition Society" by Luke Thomas, 16th Oct 2020].

*Used with permission from "Sakshi Apologists".

Monday, 8 August 2022

Who is your Messiah? (Part 1)

Who is your Messiah? (Part 1).

Searching in a library for books on better communication skills, a young man found two books. Going to the circulation desk for check-out, he said, "Hello Sir can you..", before finishing, the Librarian asked, "What's the first book?" "That's Not What I Meant," he said. "Well, what did you meant?" "That's the title of the book," he explained. "Okay," the Librarian said; looking at the young man little skeptically, "And the other book?" the Librarian asked. "You Just Don't Understand" he said. "Excuse me?" yelled the Librarian. "I got both books" the young man replied and hurried away.*

It's obvious that the Librarian certainly misunderstood the young man in the above illustration. Misunderstanding happens when you don't know much about someone or about his character/job. That's how the purpose of Jesus was misunderstood by people of Galilee.
Let's read Matthew 16:13,14, "When Jesus came to the region of Caesarea Philippi, he asked his disciples, “Who do people say that the Son of Man is?” They replied, “Some say John the Baptist; others, Elijah; still others, Jeremiah or one of the prophets"." 

When Jesus asked Peter this question, what was Jesus expecting from the people? Was Jesus trying to know what people might deduce by his words and works, that he might be called a New Cult Leader who oppose the Law of Moses (Matt 9:3; 9:14; 11:25-30; 12:19-12; 12:2; 16:4b by equating himself with Jonah the prophet) or a New Philosopher (Matt 8:20; 12:48-50; 10:16-29; 9:12-16; 15:10,11,16-20) or a Revolutionist (Matt 10:10b for raising about rightful wages; 12:42b by equating himself with King Solomon; 16:11b) or an Exorcist (Matt 9:34; 12:24; 12:43-45) or a Taleteller (Matt 13th Chapter); or a Cusser (Matt 10:34:36; 1120-24)? Whatever. Peter answerd plainly, “Some say John the Baptist; others, Elijah; still others, Jeremiah or one of the prophets". Why people thought of Jesus in this manner? Are there parallels between them and Jesus? Is this parallelism on a positive side or have an adverse effect? Let's find out.

John the Baptist -

We know that he is the prophesied predecessor (Isaiah 40:3) of Jesus preparing the hearts for receiving the coming kingdom of God (Matt 3:2). Some thought of him a Messiah (Lk 3:15, Jn 1:20), and some Elijah (Jn 1:21), which he denied, though Jesus in Matt 11:14, confirms that "he is Elijah who is to come". John resembles the same as like Elijah in 2Kings 1:7,8. Born in the priestly clan of Abijah to Zechariah and Elizabeth (Lk 1:5), and having a lifestyle of wearing camel-hair garment with a leather belt around his waist and ate locusts and wild honey (Mk 1:6). There are many other things that are written about John the Baptist in the four gospels apart his teachings and disciples. But what made the people of Galilee think of Jesus as John the Baptist, a man who was dead by then. After the death of Herod the Great, his kingdom was divided between his sons Archelaus, Antipas (the tetrarch) and Philip (the tetrarch). It was Antipas who married Herodias the wife of Philip his brother. And John rebuked Antipas the tetrarch because of Herodias, his brother's wife, and all the evil things he had done.. in order to please Herodias Antipas arrested John and locked up John in prison (at Macherus, the strong fortress on the east of the Dead Sea) (Lk 3:19; Mk 6:18; Matt 14:3). Herodias had grudge against John and wanted to kill him. But she could not.. (Mk 6:19). An oppurtune time came on Antipas birthday (Palestinian Talmud and Mishna says it was on the eve of his "birthday", while Babylonian Talmud had a different interpretation, "the day on which the king ascended the throne"). When Antipas gave a banquet for his nobles, military commanders, and leading men of Galilee. When Herodias own daughter (Josephus says that "Salome" was her name and was born to Herodias and Philip. Antiq 18.5.4.136) came and danced, she pleased Antipas and his guests. The king (tetrarch) said to the girl, "Ask whatever you want, and I will give it to you.. upto half of my kingdom" he promised her with an oath. She went out and said to her mother, "What should I ask for?" "John the Baptist's head", she said. At once she hurried to the king and said, "I want you to give me John the Baptist's head on a platter immediately. Although the king was deeply distressed, because of his oaths and the guests, he did not want to refuse her. The king immediately sent for an executioner and commanded him to bring John's head. So he went and beheaded him in prison, brought his head on a platter, and gave it to the girl. Then the girl gave it to her mother. When John's disciples heard about it, they came and removed his corpse, buried it in a tomb, and went and reported to Jesus (Mk 6:19-29; Matt 14:6-12). It has also been written that Antipas wanted to kill John, though he feared John and protected him, knowing he was a righteous and holy man; he also feared the crowd since they regarded John as a prophet. Even though when Antipas heard him he was perplexed (confused) and yet he liked to listen to him (Mk 6:20; Matt 14:5).

Josephus writes about John in his Antiquities 18.5.2, that "(John) who was a good man, and commanded the Jews to exercise virtue, both as to righteousness towards one another, and piety towards God, and so to come to baptism; ...Now, when many others came in crowds about him, for they were greatly moved or pleased by hearing his words, Herod (Antipas) who feared lest the great influence John had over the people might put it into his power and inclination to raise a rebellion [for they seemed ready to do anything he should advise], though it best by putting him to death. ..Accordingly he was sent a prisoner, out of Antipas suspicious temper, to Macherus the castle I before mentioned, and was there put to death."

Commentators say that the "imprisonment of John the Baptist by Antipas was just as Josephus states, fear of political trouble. The powerful popular preacher did undoubtedly produce a great excitement, which was indeed first of all of a religious kind, but certainly not without the mingling of a political element. For the masses of the people were not then able to keep separate their religious and political hopes. It is therefore quiet credible that Antipas feared political troubles from the labours of John the Baptist."
We can also know of this great following of John the Baptist from the Scriptures too. "Then people from Jerusalem, all Judea, and all the vicinity of the Jordan were going out to him, and they were baptized by him in the Jordan River, confessing their sins" (Matt 3:5; Mk 1:5; Lk 3:2,7). Gospel of John 1:19,24, says that even John was visited by priests, Levites and Pharisees too, though to enquire of him. It was in this situation it was wise enough for Antipas to arrest and keep John safe than to kill a man of such a stature who have a huge following (Matt 3:5; Mk 1:5; Lk 3:2,7), and invite a rebellion; but the unintended had happened.

By then Jesus was very popular among the people. He travelled through Syria, Galilee, Decapolis and more visiting Capernaum, Gadara, Gennesaret, Caesarea Philippi etc. (mostly the northern part of Israel). He had a phenomenal following (Matt 4:12; 24-25; 8:16; 9:33; 9:36; 12:15; 12:23; 12:46; 13:36; 14:13; 15:10; 15:30). "Jesus went to every town and village, teaching..." (Matt 9:35). It is this following that the people of Galilee might have had in expecting Jesus as John the Baptist (Matt 16:14). And there might be some rebellious groups waiting for someone to lead a rebellion against Romans could also be a reason too. And since it is for Antipas to see that there aren't any disturbances in the administration, perplexed when he heard of John the Baptist whom he beheaded had been raised to life (Lk 9:7,9), since some Jewish sects believe in resurrection. Seeing a man of such a huge following, and dealing with the present situations of rebellious groups and their leaders in the Judean habitation, it is better to watch than to do something else.

Thus, it is these qualities of Jesus that made the people of Galilee to think of Jesus as John the Baptist. 

Prophet Elijah -

Why would the people of Galilee thought of Jesus as Elijah the prophet? As is written Elijah was a prophet from Tishbite in Gilead (or from settlers in Gilead) (1Kings 17:1). There are certain similarities between Elijah and Jesus, other than congruencies.

Let's see the similarities-

1. Who can influence the nature:
    1Kings 17:1; 18:45,46 - Matt 8:23-27; 14:26-      26; 31-32.
2. Who was served by nonhumans:
    1Kings 17:6 - Matt 4:11.
3. Who can challenge the authorities:
    1Kings 18:24 - Matt 9:3,14; 16:4b; 12:2, 10-        12; 15:1-2; etc.
4. Who elects his disciple(s):
    1Kings 19:16 - Matt 10:1-4; Lk 6:13-16.
5. Who prophecy:
    1Kings 17:1,14; 18:45-46; 21:22-24 [fulfilled      22:29-38; 2Kings 9:24-37].
    Matt 8:11,12; 11:22,24; 12:36; 16:4, 12:39-          41.
6. Who was taken up into heaven:
    2Kings 2:11 - Lk 24:51; Ac 1:11.

Just to make the long description short I have given above the list of similarities between Elijah and Jesus.

Now let's see congruencies-

1. Unlimited sustenance-
    1Kings 17:9-16 - Matt 14:15-21; 15:32-38.
This miracle demonstrates how God can provide in whatever adverse conditions might be. In 1Kings 17:9 we see an important place Zarephath. This place is under Ethbaal's control (father of Jazebel, wife of king Ahab). This is a harbour city on the coast of Mediterranean Sea. The main exports are grain and oil. A helpless widow who was gathering wood (v10) at the city gate. She is here to collect wood waste (sticks, v12)and dry stack for fire including the grain that has fallen on the way while transport, because this is the only official way in and out of the city. Convinced by the conversation, the widow takes Elijah home and gives him a small loaf of bread made with leftover dough and oil. God saw this faithful widow helping His prophet and blessed her back with providence until it rained (1Kings 18:45) as prophesied by his prophet.

Let's come to Matthew 14:15-21. Here we see Jesus retiring to a desert area (v13) and the crowds followed. May be, till morning Jesus was healing the sick, and by evening (v15) including Jesus they all were starving. The place written in v13 and v15 are denoted by the same word "érēmos" (gk), which meant, an uncultivated piece of land used for pasture. You can deduct the right meaning for the word "érēmos" in Luke 15:4 (wilderness but pasture land). This land might be far from a habitation area. In spite of the advices by His disciples, Jesus didn't send them away, but wanted to provide them something to eat. With nothing left with anyone, the disciples gave Jesus the leftover food left with them. Jesus took the five loaves and two fish, blessed it, broke the loaves and gave them to his disciples. About five thousand and above ate. If you compare this part of text with John 6:1-15, it seems that the crowd is of completely Israelites, because you can read the word "Passover festival". And only Jews will celebrate Passover festival. The widow in 1Kings 17:9-16, also wishes prophet Elijah in jewish customary, "as the Lord thy God liveth", (v12), makes it clear that she too is a Jew. We can see another miracle of the same type in Matthew 15:32-38. Although it was done around the same place, just because of no specific jewish related word, the crowd might be of different faiths/customs (?). 

Hence, by these similarities the people of Galilee might have compared Jesus with prophet Elijah.

2. Bringing back dead to life-
    1Kings 17:17-24 - Matt 9:18-19, 23-26.

By the above explanation we now know that the widow in 1Kings 17, is an Israelite (a Jew by customs). Some medical experts say that Elijah had done mouth-to-mouth resuscitation, but v21 reads that Elijah stretched over the laying boy (v19) three times and not doing anything as the medical experts expected. So bringing the little boy back to life is a sheer clear miracle by God. 

Now let's come to Matthew 9:18-19; 23-26. We read that in v18, that a grieving father came to Jesus was a "leader". We don't know what type of leader is he? Is he a leader from the government side or a magistrate or from any other profession is doubtful, because the word "árchon" (gk) may be designated to many fields of administration. To understand to which profession leader is this grieving father, let's look into gospel of Luke. In Luke 8:40-42, 49-56, we can read almost the same Scripture as we read in gospel of Matthew. If we look in Lk 8:41, we read that the grieving father's name is "Jairus", and he is a "leader of the synagogue". It's the word "sunagogé" (gk), which specifies his field of administration. Now we know that this father is also a Jew as like the widow we read in 1Kings 17. The rest is Jesus brings this twelve year old girl (Lk 8:42) back to life.

It might be because of these similarities and congruencies between Elijah and Jesus, the people of Galilee might have thought of Jesus as Elijah or there might be a chance of people reminded of the prophecy by Malachi in 4:5, "Behold, I will send you Elijah the prophet before the great and awesome day of the Lord comes." Now that we know that the prophesied prophet (Elijah) is John the Baptist by Jesus confession (Matt 11:14) in a conversation with his disciples; but what about the people of Galilee? Can they unravel and interpret the prophecy of Malachi 4:5?

Prophet Jeremiah -

Jeremiah came from the town of Anathoth (Jer 1:1). He is generally known as the weeping prophet. This prophet goes on pleading God even though the Lord has said him that He will not listen to his pleas. Jeremiah 7:16 reads, "so do not pray for this people nor offer any plea or petition for them; do not plead with me, for I will not listen to you." But Jeremiah goes on pleading in 14:7, 20, "Although our sins testify against us, O Lord, do something for the same of your name. For our backsliding is great; we have sinned against you. O Lord, we acknowledge our wickedness and the guilt of our fathers; we have indeed sinned against you. For the sake of your name do not despise us; do not dishonour your glorious throne. Remember your covenant with us and do not break it." Speaking about Jesus, John the Baptist testifies, "Look, the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world" (Jn 1:29). Remembering the covenant Jesus says, "For I have come down from heaven not to do my will but to do the will of Him who sent me", "This is what is written: The Christ will suffer and rise from the dead on the third day, and repentence and forgiveness of sins will be preached in His name to all nations, beginning from Jesusalem" (Jn 6:38, Lk 24:46). 

There are still more similarities and congruencies that we can draw from the life of prophet Jeremiah and words and works of Jesus. To mention some:

Similarities -

1. As a Prisoner:
Jer 37:18 (11-21) - Matt 27:1,2.

2. Writing the second time with something extra (New Covenant):
Jer 31:31-34; 36:27,28,32 - Matt Chapters 5,6,7 (Matt 5:24,28,32,34-36,39-42,44; 6:2,3,6,14; 7:1).
The Lord told Jeremiah to write down whatever He had said about Israel and Judah. As said Jeremiah sent for Baruch, and with his help has written down whatever is been said by God. Jeremiah advised Baruch to go to the Temple and read it aloud. As said Baruch read the scroll aloud. Instead of fearing King Jehoiakim burned the scroll. Then the Lord advices Jeremiah to write down another scroll, which contained not just the things that contained in the first scroll but more than what was dictated. For more eloberate reading go to Jeremiah 36th Chapter. Probably the additional words  might be from Chapter 50 to end of Chapter 51, because they prophecy about how the Lord is going to treat with Babylon. It's about Babylon's capture, invasion and it's enemies. Even though Jerusalem was captured and it's people gone into exile, the Lord ends with a hope that, "although Babylon's walls reach to the sky, the army I send will destroy that city. I the Lord has spoken" (Jer 51:53). The second scroll with this addition has handed over to Seraiah, brother of Baruch and sent him to Babylon with a message of hope. The message of hope is a "new agreement/covenant". The hope that will never be uprooted. Read Jeremiah 31:31-40. The Sermon on the Mount is where we observe the facets of this new covenant building up. This new covenant surpases that of the Pharisees and the teachers of the Law of Moses (Matt 5:20). "But I tell you..", these words of Jesus adds up a new dimension to the Law that was there till then. This new covenant was what Jeremiah prophecied, "But this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, declares the LORD: I will put my law within them, and I will write it on their hearts. And I will be their God, and they shall be my people. And no longer shall each one teach his neighbor and each his brother, saying, 'Know the LORD,'for they shall all know me, from the least of them to the greatest, declares the LORD. For I will forgive their iniquity, and I will remember their sin no more" (Jer 31:33,34).

3. Painful Death:
According to the early church father, Tertullian, the Jews stoned Jeremiah to death in Daphne (Tahpanhes, in Hebrew) Egypt. Jeremiah’s crime was telling them truths they did not want to hear (Scorpiace Chapter 8). The tradition of Jeremiah’s martyrdom is backed by other first-century, extrabiblical writings(Lives of the Prophets), and invoked in the works of Jerome, Isidore of Seville’s De Ortu Et Obitu Patrum, and 12th century French author, Peter Comestor’s, (Historia Scholastica. However, one Jewish tradition claims that, when Nebuchadnezzar invaded Egypt around 569 BC, he took Jeremiah from Egypt to Babylon, where Jeremiah died.*
And death of Jesus is by Crucifixion (Matt 27:33,35,38).

4. Prophecy about destruction of the Temple:
Jer 26:2,6 (chapter 7) - Matt 24:2; Lk 21:5,6.
Jeremiah's prophecy comes true in Book of  Jeremiah 52:13-27, reads that the first temple was destroyed by Nebuzaradan the captian of King Nebuchadnezzar in BC 586,  while Jesus prophecy comes true in AD 70 by Titus the son of Emperor Vespasian.

Congruencies  -

1. Threats of death penalty:
Jer 26:2,11 - Matt 12:14.

2. Substandard behavior of their brothers:
Jer 12:6 - Jn 7:3,4.
The Lord's reply clearly mentions that Jeremiah's brothers always tried to pull-the-leg. They intented to take life of Jeremiah, if he tried to prophecy in the name of the Lord (Jer 11:21). In the same way Jesus brothers (Matt 12:46,47) also tried to make fun of Jesus. James, Joseph, Judas and Simon (Mk 6:3) as mentioned, never believed (Jn 7:5) in works of Jesus and made fun of him, saying to show yourself (Jesus) to the world, which if done in haste, there might cause a disturbance to the plan of God. That's the reason why Jesus replys the, "My time has not yet arrived.." (Matt 7:6).

3. Surprising way of treating the enemies:
Jer 29:7 - Matt 5:44.*
By now Jerusalem was attacked and King Zedekiah sends Pashhur and Zephaniah to Jeremiah to ask the Lord to work miracles (Jer 21:1), then Jeremiah advices to surrender to the Babylonian army. To those who were been deported to Babylon, Jeremiah carries the word of the Lord, "Pray for the peace of Babylonia and work hard to make it prosperous. Pray to the Lord for it, because if it prospers, you too will prosper." Isn't it surprising! This what the Lord advised to the exiles. Praying for our enemies is an unthinkable response. Jesus in his famous Sermon on the Mount, also preaches a similar thing, "You have heard that it was said, Love your neighbour and hate your enemy. But I tell you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you" (Matt 5:43,44), which is the hardest thing to put in practice. But this surprising advice is what Jesus expects from us.

These similarities and congruencies of Jeremiah: though Peter has said to Jesus about the people's thoughts, the actual comparision of Jeremiah with Jesus might have been majorly within the circles of the priestly services. Because the scrolls and their studies are with them, where the laymen has never access to. The encounters between the priestly heads and Jesus have taken place a few times by now. Jairus, the leader of synagogue (Mk 5:22), has already experienced the fellowship of Jesus, which might hasten the conversation within the priestly circles. So, I believe the comparision of Jesus with Jeremiah might weigh more within the elite class rather than within the laymen.

By this we have come to the end of the first part of our study on Matthew 16:13-19.

*External sources.